PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQHX vs. FRKMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRQHX vs. FRKMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FRQHX having a 3.89% return and FRKMX slightly lower at 3.83%.


FRQHX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.03%
YTD
3.89%
6M
4.19%
1Y
9.89%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*

FRKMX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.02%
YTD
3.83%
6M
4.13%
1Y
9.76%
3Y*
7.56%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQHX vs. FRKMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.89%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%
FRKMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K
3.83%9.91%4.40%8.17%-11.57%2.88%8.68%3.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQHX and FRKMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.99

The correlation between FRQHX and FRKMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRQHX vs. FRKMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FRKMX
FRKMX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FRKMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRKMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRKMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FRKMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRKMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQHX vs. FRKMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRQHXFRKMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.49

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.01

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

12.84

+0.20

FRQHX vs. FRKMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the FRKMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQHX and FRKMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRQHXFRKMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.47

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.54

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.79

0.00

Drawdowns

FRQHX vs. FRKMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQHX drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, which is greater than FRKMX's maximum drawdown of -16.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQHX and FRKMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQHXFRKMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.90%

-16.04%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-3.42%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.15%

-4.93%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.90%

-16.04%

-0.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.25%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-3.56%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.80%

0.00%

Volatility

FRQHX vs. FRKMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K (FRKMX) have volatilities of 1.66% and 1.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRQHXFRKMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.68%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

3.41%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

4.16%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.56%

5.29%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

5.14%

+0.62%

FRQHX vs. FRKMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than FRKMX's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRQHX vs. FRKMX - Dividend Comparison

FRQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than FRKMX's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FRKMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K
3.20%3.11%3.12%2.92%4.66%3.65%2.56%1.85%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.30%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FRQHX and FRKMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRKMX has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to FRQHX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQHX dropped -16.90% vs FRKMX's -16.04%.

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRQHX and FRKMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer