PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQHX vs. FHPDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRQHX vs. FHPDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6 (FHPDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FRQHX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FHPDX

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.71%
6M
3.54%
YTD
4.79%
1Y
10.49%
3Y*
8.32%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQHX vs. FHPDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.71%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%
FHPDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6
4.79%11.22%5.32%9.88%-13.04%5.31%10.90%4.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQHX and FHPDX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.97

The correlation between FRQHX and FHPDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRQHX vs. FHPDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FHPDX
FHPDX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FHPDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHPDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHPDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FHPDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHPDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQHX vs. FHPDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6 (FHPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRQHXFHPDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.88

FRQHX vs. FHPDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRQHX vs. FHPDX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQHXFHPDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

Volatility

FRQHX vs. FHPDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRQHXFHPDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.74%

FRQHX vs. FHPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FHPDX's 0.21% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FRQHX vs. FHPDX - Dividend Comparison

FRQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than FHPDX's 3.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHPDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class K6
3.01%3.16%2.99%2.79%5.75%6.10%3.54%2.44%2.02%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.25%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FRQHX and FHPDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRQHX and FHPDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer