FRQHX vs. FFWTX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) and FFWTX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class) are both Target Retirement Date funds. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FRQHX charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FFWTX.

Performance

FRQHX vs. FFWTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FRQHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FFWTX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: -0.21%
• 6M: 3.13%
• YTD: 4.20%
• 1Y: 9.30%
• 3Y*: 7.93%
• 5Y*: 3.38%
• 10Y*: 5.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQHX vs. FFWTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.71%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	4.04%	9.80%	3.95%
FFWTX Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class	4.20%	10.16%	5.83%	9.88%	-12.97%	5.15%	10.45%	4.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQHX and FFWTX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.96

The correlation between FRQHX and FFWTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRQHX vs. FFWTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFWTX

FFWTX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FFWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FFWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FFWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FFWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FFWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQHX vs. FFWTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFWTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRQHX	FFWTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.01	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.89	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.13	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FRQHX	FFWTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-17.44%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.68%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-5.72%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.44%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-17.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.43%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.88%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FRQHX	FFWTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	4.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.79%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	6.15%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	6.08%	—

FRQHX vs. FFWTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FFWTX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FRQHX vs. FFWTX - Dividend Comparison

FRQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than FFWTX's 3.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFWTX Fidelity Freedom Index 2010 Fund Institutional Premium Class	3.79%	4.56%	5.03%	3.32%	3.76%	3.70%	2.59%	16.46%	4.78%	2.64%	1.91%	1.62%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.25%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRQHX and FFWTX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FRQHX and FFWTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.