PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQHX vs. BDMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRQHX vs. BDMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQHX achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than BDMIX's 12.62% return.


FRQHX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.03%
YTD
3.89%
6M
4.19%
1Y
9.89%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*

BDMIX

1D
0.12%
1M
4.79%
YTD
12.62%
6M
15.26%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
21.87%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
8.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQHX vs. BDMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.89%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
12.62%18.30%21.39%14.55%1.80%3.34%0.29%-4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQHX and BDMIX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.06

The correlation between FRQHX and BDMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRQHX vs. BDMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BDMIX
BDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQHX vs. BDMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRQHXBDMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.62

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

6.23

-3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

17.67

-4.63

FRQHX vs. BDMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the BDMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQHX and BDMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRQHXBDMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

3.23

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

1.99

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.24

-0.44

Drawdowns

FRQHX vs. BDMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQHX drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, which is greater than BDMIX's maximum drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQHX and BDMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQHXBDMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.90%

-11.89%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-3.54%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.15%

-4.07%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.90%

-6.15%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

0.00%

-0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-2.68%

-1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

1.25%

-0.45%

Volatility

FRQHX vs. BDMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) is 1.66%, while BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX) has a volatility of 1.83%. This indicates that FRQHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRQHXBDMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.83%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

4.45%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

6.82%

-2.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.56%

6.52%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

5.81%

-0.05%

FRQHX vs. BDMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than BDMIX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRQHX vs. BDMIX - Dividend Comparison

FRQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than BDMIX's 7.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
7.93%8.94%13.26%7.42%0.00%1.23%0.30%6.78%0.94%0.00%0.00%1.86%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.30%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRQHX and BDMIX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDMIX has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to FRQHX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQHX dropped -16.90% vs BDMIX's -11.89%.

BDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRQHX and BDMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer