PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQHX vs. ASFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRQHX vs. ASFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQHX achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than ASFYX's 15.25% return.


FRQHX

1D
-0.24%
1M
1.03%
YTD
3.89%
6M
4.19%
1Y
9.89%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
2.95%
10Y*

ASFYX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.36%
YTD
15.25%
6M
17.47%
1Y
25.96%
3Y*
-1.44%
5Y*
2.84%
10Y*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQHX vs. ASFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.89%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%3.95%
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
15.25%-9.67%-3.22%-10.33%35.67%3.52%13.59%-1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQHX and ASFYX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.01

Over the past year, FRQHX and ASFYX have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRQHX vs. ASFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ASFYX
ASFYX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
ASFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ASFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQHX vs. ASFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRQHXASFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.40

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

5.08

-2.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

18.34

-5.30

FRQHX vs. ASFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the ASFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQHX and ASFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRQHXASFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.27

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.21

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.35

+0.45

Drawdowns

FRQHX vs. ASFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQHX drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, smaller than the maximum ASFYX drawdown of -36.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQHX and ASFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQHXASFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.90%

-36.43%

+19.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-5.24%

+1.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.15%

-30.32%

+25.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.90%

-36.43%

+19.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-18.22%

+17.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-13.18%

+9.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

1.45%

-0.65%

Volatility

FRQHX vs. ASFYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) is 1.66%, while AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y (ASFYX) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that FRQHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRQHXASFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

3.66%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.42%

9.52%

-6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.15%

11.76%

-7.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.56%

13.76%

-8.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

12.71%

-6.95%

FRQHX vs. ASFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than ASFYX's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRQHX vs. ASFYX - Dividend Comparison

FRQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than ASFYX's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASFYX
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class Y
1.32%1.52%1.46%0.99%32.48%6.07%3.40%5.51%1.30%0.07%0.01%5.06%
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.30%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRQHX and ASFYX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASFYX has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to FRQHX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQHX dropped -16.90% vs ASFYX's -36.43%.

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRQHX and ASFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer