PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQAX vs. FRIMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRQAX vs. FRIMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FRQAX having a 3.51% return and FRIMX slightly higher at 3.59%. Over the past 10 years, FRQAX has outperformed FRIMX with an annualized return of 4.76%, while FRIMX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.21% annualized return.


FRQAX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.15%
YTD
3.51%
6M
4.08%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
6.96%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
4.76%

FRIMX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.15%
YTD
3.59%
6M
4.18%
1Y
9.42%
3Y*
7.18%
5Y*
2.78%
10Y*
4.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRQAX vs. FRIMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
3.51%9.54%4.21%8.24%-12.60%3.56%9.32%12.33%-3.06%10.34%
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
3.59%9.94%4.30%8.06%-11.66%2.78%8.57%10.57%-1.82%7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQAX and FRIMX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007

0.99

The correlation between FRQAX and FRIMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRQAX vs. FRIMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQAX
FRQAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FRQAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FRIMX
FRIMX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FRIMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRIMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRIMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRIMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRIMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQAX vs. FRIMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRQAXFRIMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.76

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

11.58

-0.43

FRQAX vs. FRIMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FRIMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQAX and FRIMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRQAX vs. FRIMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQAX drawdown since its inception was -38.22%, which is greater than FRIMX's maximum drawdown of -33.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQAX and FRIMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQAXFRIMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.22%

-33.73%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.46%

-3.44%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.27%

-4.97%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.24%

-16.12%

-1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.24%

-16.12%

-1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.43%

-0.44%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.57%

-3.70%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.83%

0.82%

+0.01%

Volatility

FRQAX vs. FRIMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A (FRQAX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I (FRIMX) have volatilities of 1.82% and 1.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRQAXFRIMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

1.82%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.68%

3.68%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.35%

4.35%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.59%

5.32%

+0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.34%

4.54%

+0.80%

FRQAX vs. FRIMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQAX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than FRIMX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRQAX vs. FRIMX - Dividend Comparison

FRQAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than FRIMX's 3.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRIMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class I
3.24%3.11%3.01%2.82%4.52%3.54%2.41%2.56%4.67%8.56%1.67%1.68%
FRQAX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class A
2.99%2.72%2.71%2.46%4.74%5.76%3.26%2.93%5.33%16.05%2.18%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FRQAX and FRIMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRIMX has higher volatility (1.82%) compared to FRQAX (1.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRQAX dropped -38.22% vs FRIMX's -33.73%.

FRIMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRQAX and FRIMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer