PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRNW vs. MLI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRNW vs. MLI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRNW achieves a 23.62% return, which is significantly higher than MLI's 20.69% return.


FRNW

1D
0.40%
1M
-4.24%
YTD
23.62%
6M
23.50%
1Y
63.53%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
10Y*

MLI

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.23%
YTD
20.69%
6M
20.88%
1Y
87.45%
3Y*
52.10%
5Y*
45.38%
10Y*
26.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRNW vs. MLI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
23.62%53.20%-21.11%-19.64%-11.46%-2.52%
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
20.69%46.29%70.51%62.38%1.05%40.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FRNW and MLI is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRNW vs. MLI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRNW
FRNW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FRNW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRNW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRNW Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FRNW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRNW Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

MLI
MLI Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
MLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRNW vs. MLI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRNWMLIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.50

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

3.94

+0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.55

10.92

+4.63

FRNW vs. MLI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRNW Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the MLI Sharpe Ratio of 2.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRNW and MLI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRNW vs. MLI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRNW drawdown since its inception was -59.37%, roughly equal to the maximum MLI drawdown of -61.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRNW and MLI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRNWMLIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.37%

-61.72%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.20%

-22.33%

+8.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.14%

-27.79%

-17.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.73%

-1.93%

-8.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.15%

-16.04%

-17.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.10%

8.03%

-3.93%

Volatility

FRNW vs. MLI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Clean Energy ETF (FRNW) and Mueller Industries, Inc. (MLI) have volatilities of 10.63% and 10.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRNWMLIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.63%

10.51%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.59%

25.79%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.98%

30.06%

-3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.51%

33.07%

-4.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.51%

35.79%

-7.28%

Dividends

FRNW vs. MLI - Dividend Comparison

FRNW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than MLI's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRNW
Fidelity Clean Energy ETF
1.02%1.25%1.43%1.30%0.69%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MLI
Mueller Industries, Inc.
0.87%0.87%1.01%1.27%1.69%0.88%1.14%1.26%1.71%9.60%0.94%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRNW and MLI have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRNW has higher volatility (10.63%) compared to MLI (10.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRNW dropped -59.37% vs MLI's -61.72%.

MLI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRNW and MLI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer