FRIAX vs. INCM
FRIAX (Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class) and INCM (Franklin Income Focus ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Franklin Templeton. Over the past year, FRIAX returned 14.62% vs 16.23% for INCM. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRIAX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for INCM.
Performance
FRIAX vs. INCM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRIAX achieves a 5.29% return, which is significantly lower than INCM's 7.07% return.
FRIAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 5.29%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- 1Y
- 14.62%
- 3Y*
- 10.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
INCM
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 7.07%
- 6M
- 7.76%
- 1Y
- 16.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FRIAX vs. INCM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FRIAX Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class | 5.29% | 12.02% | 7.29% | 5.76% |
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 7.07% | 13.07% | 6.80% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRIAX and INCM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2023 | 0.72 |
The correlation between FRIAX and INCM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRIAX vs. INCM — Risk / Return Rank
FRIAX
INCM
FRIAX vs. INCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX) and Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRIAX | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.59 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.79 | 5.11 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.32 | 21.52 | -3.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRIAX | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.92 | 3.09 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.54 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
FRIAX vs. INCM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRIAX drawdown since its inception was -43.23%, which is greater than INCM's maximum drawdown of -7.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIAX and INCM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRIAX | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.23% | -7.84% | -35.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -3.19% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.10% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.17% | -0.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -1.09% | -2.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.80% | 0.76% | +0.04% |
Volatility
FRIAX vs. INCM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class (FRIAX) is 1.11%, while Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) has a volatility of 1.60%. This indicates that FRIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRIAX | INCM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.11% | 1.60% | -0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.80% | 3.86% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.04% | 5.27% | -0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.98% | 7.23% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.29% | 7.23% | +2.06% |
FRIAX vs. INCM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRIAX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than INCM's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRIAX vs. INCM - Dividend Comparison
FRIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, more than INCM's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRIAX Franklin Income Fund Advisor Class | 5.71% | 5.75% | 5.74% | 5.67% | 5.24% | 6.70% | 5.37% | 5.25% | 5.80% | 5.20% | 4.92% | 5.93% |
INCM Franklin Income Focus ETF | 5.05% | 4.96% | 5.06% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRIAX and INCM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INCM has higher volatility (1.60%) compared to FRIAX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRIAX dropped -43.23% vs INCM's -7.84%.
INCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.09 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRIAX and INCM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer