FRI vs. NETL
FRI (First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund) and NETL (NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds - FRI tracks the S&P United States REIT while NETL tracks the Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRI returned 4.41%/yr vs 1.33%/yr for NETL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRI charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for NETL.
Performance
FRI vs. NETL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRI achieves a 11.90% return, which is significantly higher than NETL's 10.34% return.
FRI
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 11.90%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.41%
- 10Y*
- 5.62%
NETL
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- -1.07%
- YTD
- 10.34%
- 6M
- 9.20%
- 1Y
- 11.59%
- 3Y*
- 7.12%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- —
FRI vs. NETL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRI First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund | 11.90% | 2.80% | 7.84% | 13.33% | -24.66% | 42.55% | -7.90% | 8.19% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 10.34% | 6.05% | -1.08% | 2.69% | -16.16% | 27.36% | -0.73% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRI and NETL is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2019 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FRI and NETL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
FRI vs. NETL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FRI
NETL
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Technology
-
-
Real Estate
FRI
NETL
Financial Services
FRI
NETL
-
Utilities
FRI
NETL
-
Basic Materials
FRI
-
NETL
-
Communication Services
FRI
-
NETL
-
Consumer Cyclical
FRI
-
NETL
-
Consumer Defensive
FRI
-
NETL
-
Energy
FRI
-
NETL
-
Healthcare
FRI
-
NETL
-
Industrials
FRI
-
NETL
-
Technology
FRI
-
NETL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRI vs. NETL — Risk / Return Rank
FRI
NETL
FRI vs. NETL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI) and NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRI | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 0.86 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 1.26 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.27 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.21 | 3.99 | +2.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRI | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 0.86 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.07 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.20 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
FRI vs. NETL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRI drawdown since its inception was -71.95%, which is greater than NETL's maximum drawdown of -51.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRI and NETL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRI | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.95% | -51.48% | -20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.57% | -9.16% | +1.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -19.30% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.21% | -30.74% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.24% | -3.68% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.70% | -11.65% | -2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.38% | 2.91% | -0.53% |
Volatility
FRI vs. NETL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund (FRI) has a higher volatility of 3.93% compared to NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF (NETL) at 3.66%. This indicates that FRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NETL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRI | NETL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | 3.66% | +0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.14% | 9.66% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 13.57% | -0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 17.94% | +0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 25.92% | -4.86% |
FRI vs. NETL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than NETL's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRI vs. NETL - Dividend Comparison
FRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than NETL's 4.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRI First Trust S&P REIT Index Fund | 2.60% | 2.99% | 3.33% | 3.24% | 2.52% | 1.44% | 3.08% | 2.28% | 3.21% | 2.82% | 3.27% | 2.66% |
NETL NETLease Corporate Real Estate ETF | 4.83% | 5.12% | 5.08% | 4.57% | 4.47% | 4.03% | 3.98% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRI and NETL have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRI has higher volatility (3.93%) compared to NETL (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRI dropped -71.95% vs NETL's -51.48%.
On 5-year performance, FRI leads with 4.41% vs 1.33% for NETL. On fees, FRI is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NETL has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FRI has performed better with a 4.41% return vs 1.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FRI is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for NETL.
NETL has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 2.60% for FRI.
FRI tracks S&P United States REIT, while NETL tracks Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for FRI and 0.60% for NETL.
FRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRI and NETL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer