FRHMX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FRHMX (Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds from BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, FRHMX returned 3.09%/yr vs 3.09%/yr for FRQHX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FRHMX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.

Performance

FRHMX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with FRHMX at 4.14% and FRQHX at 4.14%.

FRHMX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.57%
• YTD: 4.14%
• 6M: 4.37%
• 1Y: 10.63%
• 3Y*: 7.75%
• 5Y*: 3.09%
• 10Y*: —

FRQHX

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.55%
• YTD: 4.14%
• 6M: 4.39%
• 1Y: 10.64%
• 3Y*: 7.87%
• 5Y*: 3.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRHMX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRHMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6	4.14%	10.02%	4.50%	8.28%	-11.48%	2.98%	8.79%	3.17%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	4.14%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	4.04%	9.80%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FRHMX and FRQHX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019	0.99

The correlation between FRHMX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRHMX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRHMX

FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FRQHX

FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRHMX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FRHMX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	2.60	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.80	3.84	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.52	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	3.16	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.40	13.43	-0.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FRHMX vs. FRQHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRHMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the FRQHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRHMX and FRQHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRHMX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	2.60	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.56	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.80	+0.02

Drawdowns

FRHMX vs. FRQHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRHMX drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, smaller than the maximum FRQHX drawdown of -16.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRHMX and FRQHX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRHMX	FRQHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.96%	-16.90%	+0.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.42%	-3.41%	-0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.90%	-5.15%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.96%	-16.90%	+0.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-3.79%	+0.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.80%	0.80%	0.00%

Volatility

FRHMX vs. FRQHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) have volatilities of 1.67% and 1.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRHMX	FRQHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.67%	1.66%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.43%	3.41%	+0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.16%	4.14%	+0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.29%	5.56%	-0.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.15%	5.76%	-0.61%

FRHMX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRHMX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FRHMX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

FRHMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, less than FRQHX's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FRHMX Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6	3.25%	3.22%	3.24%	3.02%	4.77%	3.78%	2.61%	1.95%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.29%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRHMX and FRQHX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FRHMX and FRQHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FRHMX or FRQHX?

FRHMX has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to FRQHX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRHMX dropped -15.96% vs FRQHX's -16.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FRQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.