PortfoliosLab logo
HLNE vs. PWP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HLNE and PWP is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HLNE vs. PWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HLNE:

0.49

PWP:

0.31

Sortino Ratio

HLNE:

0.98

PWP:

0.80

Omega Ratio

HLNE:

1.13

PWP:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

HLNE:

0.59

PWP:

0.35

Martin Ratio

HLNE:

1.31

PWP:

0.86

Ulcer Index

HLNE:

16.65%

PWP:

16.95%

Daily Std Dev

HLNE:

42.04%

PWP:

48.46%

Max Drawdown

HLNE:

-48.47%

PWP:

-60.44%

Current Drawdown

HLNE:

-25.64%

PWP:

-33.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HLNE:

$8.20B

PWP:

$1.54B

EPS

HLNE:

$5.41

PWP:

-$0.21

PS Ratio

HLNE:

11.50

PWP:

1.55

PB Ratio

HLNE:

8.59

PWP:

5.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

HLNE:

$712.96M

PWP:

$987.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HLNE:

$335.56M

PWP:

$407.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

HLNE:

$270.49M

PWP:

$7.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLNE achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than PWP's -26.15% return.


HLNE

YTD

0.97%

1M

-7.24%

6M

-21.88%

1Y

20.35%

3Y*

31.83%

5Y*

18.45%

10Y*

N/A

PWP

YTD

-26.15%

1M

-0.21%

6M

-31.55%

1Y

14.78%

3Y*

37.15%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Hamilton Lane Incorporated

Perella Weinberg Partners

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HLNE vs. PWP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLNE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HLNE is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HLNE is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HLNE is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HLNE is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HLNE is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HLNE is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PWP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PWP is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PWP is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PWP is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PWP is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PWP is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PWP is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HLNE vs. PWP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HLNE Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the PWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLNE and PWP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

HLNE vs. PWP - Dividend Comparison

HLNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than PWP's 1.60% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
1.32%1.29%1.53%2.43%1.31%1.55%1.74%2.20%1.48%
PWP
Perella Weinberg Partners
1.60%1.17%2.29%2.86%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HLNE vs. PWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLNE drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, smaller than the maximum PWP drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLNE and PWP.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

HLNE vs. PWP - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) has a higher volatility of 16.99% compared to Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) at 12.25%. This indicates that HLNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HLNE vs. PWP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hamilton Lane Incorporated and Perella Weinberg Partners. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20212022202320242025
197.97M
211.83M
(HLNE) Total Revenue
(PWP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items