PortfoliosLab logo
HLNE vs. PWP
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HLNE and PWP is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HLNE vs. PWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HLNE:

1.32

PWP:

0.54

Sortino Ratio

HLNE:

1.86

PWP:

1.16

Omega Ratio

HLNE:

1.24

PWP:

1.14

Calmar Ratio

HLNE:

1.37

PWP:

0.68

Martin Ratio

HLNE:

3.11

PWP:

1.82

Ulcer Index

HLNE:

16.24%

PWP:

15.45%

Daily Std Dev

HLNE:

40.29%

PWP:

48.25%

Max Drawdown

HLNE:

-48.47%

PWP:

-60.44%

Current Drawdown

HLNE:

-13.67%

PWP:

-28.30%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HLNE:

$9.27B

PWP:

$1.56B

EPS

HLNE:

$5.41

PWP:

-$0.21

PS Ratio

HLNE:

13.41

PWP:

1.58

PB Ratio

HLNE:

10.59

PWP:

5.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

HLNE:

$514.99M

PWP:

$987.74M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HLNE:

$335.56M

PWP:

$407.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

HLNE:

$270.49M

PWP:

$3.20M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLNE achieves a 17.23% return, which is significantly higher than PWP's -20.57% return.


HLNE

YTD

17.23%

1M

26.05%

6M

-13.67%

1Y

52.48%

5Y*

24.85%

10Y*

N/A

PWP

YTD

-20.57%

1M

22.20%

6M

-25.48%

1Y

25.79%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HLNE vs. PWP — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLNE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HLNE is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HLNE is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HLNE is 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HLNE is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HLNE is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HLNE is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

PWP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PWP is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PWP is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PWP is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PWP is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PWP is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PWP is 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HLNE vs. PWP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HLNE Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the PWP Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLNE and PWP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HLNE vs. PWP - Dividend Comparison

HLNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, while PWP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
1.13%1.29%1.53%2.43%1.32%1.56%1.74%2.20%1.48%
PWP
Perella Weinberg Partners
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

HLNE vs. PWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLNE drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, smaller than the maximum PWP drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLNE and PWP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HLNE vs. PWP - Volatility Comparison

Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) has a higher volatility of 12.43% compared to Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) at 11.50%. This indicates that HLNE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HLNE vs. PWP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hamilton Lane Incorporated and Perella Weinberg Partners. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20212022202320242025
168.26M
211.83M
(HLNE) Total Revenue
(PWP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HLNE vs. PWP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hamilton Lane Incorporated and Perella Weinberg Partners over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
63.2%
41.9%
(HLNE) Gross Margin
(PWP) Gross Margin
HLNE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported a gross profit of 106.36M and revenue of 168.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.2%.

PWP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Perella Weinberg Partners reported a gross profit of 88.83M and revenue of 211.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.9%.

HLNE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported an operating income of 75.78M and revenue of 168.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.0%.

PWP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Perella Weinberg Partners reported an operating income of 11.67M and revenue of 211.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.

HLNE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported a net income of 52.97M and revenue of 168.26M, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.

PWP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Perella Weinberg Partners reported a net income of 17.34M and revenue of 211.83M, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.