PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HLNE vs. PWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

HLNE vs. PWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLNE achieves a -36.48% return, which is significantly lower than PWP's -5.90% return.


HLNE

1D
-4.00%
1M
-8.32%
YTD
-36.48%
6M
-29.29%
1Y
-42.06%
3Y*
7.52%
5Y*
1.40%
10Y*

PWP

1D
-3.18%
1M
-21.27%
YTD
-5.90%
6M
-7.61%
1Y
-6.28%
3Y*
28.01%
5Y*
7.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HLNE vs. PWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
-36.48%-7.90%32.40%81.36%-36.98%34.74%10.38%
PWP
Perella Weinberg Partners
-5.90%-26.45%98.18%28.39%-21.21%15.04%14.20%

Correlation

The correlation between HLNE and PWP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020

0.48

The correlation between HLNE and PWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

HLNE:

$4.29

PWP:

$0.21

PE Ratio

HLNE:

19.80

PWP:

75.75

PEG Ratio

HLNE:

1.46

PWP:

2.17

PS Ratio

HLNE:

6.06

PWP:

2.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

HLNE:

$763.40M

PWP:

$687.99M

Gross Profit (TTM)

HLNE:

$528.54M

PWP:

$698.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

HLNE:

$446.22M

PWP:

$52.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HLNE vs. PWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLNE
HLNE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
HLNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLNE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
HLNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLNE Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

PWP
PWP Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
PWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWP Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWP Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HLNE vs. PWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HLNEPWPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.10

-0.15

-0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.61

0.09

-1.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.01

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.89

-0.17

-0.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.72

-0.34

-1.38

HLNE vs. PWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HLNE Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the PWP Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLNE and PWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HLNEPWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.10

-0.15

-0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.19

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.28

+0.28

Drawdowns

HLNE vs. PWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLNE drawdown since its inception was -57.30%, smaller than the maximum PWP drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLNE and PWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HLNEPWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.30%

-60.44%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.04%

-33.93%

-13.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-57.30%

-41.33%

-15.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.30%

-60.44%

+3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.92%

-37.53%

-19.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.94%

-20.86%

+4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.47%

16.69%

+7.78%

Volatility

HLNE vs. PWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is 10.55%, while Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) has a volatility of 11.43%. This indicates that HLNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HLNEPWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.55%

11.43%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.64%

32.33%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.19%

42.86%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.99%

41.93%

-5.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.39%

40.93%

-4.54%

Dividends

HLNE vs. PWP - Dividend Comparison

HLNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than PWP's 1.73% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
2.55%1.57%1.29%1.53%2.43%1.31%1.55%1.74%2.20%1.48%
PWP
Perella Weinberg Partners
1.73%1.62%1.17%2.29%2.86%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

HLNE vs. PWP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hamilton Lane Incorporated and Perella Weinberg Partners. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
198.59M
148.92M
(HLNE) Total Revenue
(PWP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

HLNE vs. PWP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Hamilton Lane Incorporated and Perella Weinberg Partners over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
69.3%
38.7%
Portfolio components
HLNE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported a gross profit of 137.70M and revenue of 198.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.

PWP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perella Weinberg Partners reported a gross profit of 57.64M and revenue of 148.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

HLNE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported an operating income of 86.01M and revenue of 198.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 43.3%.

PWP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perella Weinberg Partners reported an operating income of -12.90M and revenue of 148.92M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.7%.

HLNE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported a net income of 58.37M and revenue of 198.59M, resulting in a net margin of 29.4%.

PWP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perella Weinberg Partners reported a net income of 1.49M and revenue of 148.92M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


HLNE and PWP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWP has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to HLNE (10.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLNE dropped -57.30% vs PWP's -60.44%.

PWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HLNE and PWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer