HLNE vs. PWP
HLNE (Hamilton Lane Incorporated) and PWP (Perella Weinberg Partners) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — HLNE in Asset Management, PWP in Capital Markets. Over the past 5 years, HLNE returned 1.40%/yr vs 7.96%/yr for PWP. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
HLNE vs. PWP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HLNE achieves a -36.48% return, which is significantly lower than PWP's -5.90% return.
HLNE
- 1D
- -4.00%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- -36.48%
- 6M
- -29.29%
- 1Y
- -42.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.40%
- 10Y*
- —
PWP
- 1D
- -3.18%
- 1M
- -21.27%
- YTD
- -5.90%
- 6M
- -7.61%
- 1Y
- -6.28%
- 3Y*
- 28.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- —
HLNE vs. PWP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLNE Hamilton Lane Incorporated | -36.48% | -7.90% | 32.40% | 81.36% | -36.98% | 34.74% | 10.38% |
PWP Perella Weinberg Partners | -5.90% | -26.45% | 98.18% | 28.39% | -21.21% | 15.04% | 14.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between HLNE and PWP is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2020 | 0.48 |
The correlation between HLNE and PWP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
HLNE:
$4.29
PWP:
$0.21
HLNE:
19.80
PWP:
75.75
HLNE:
1.46
PWP:
2.17
HLNE:
6.06
PWP:
2.16
HLNE:
$763.40M
PWP:
$687.99M
HLNE:
$528.54M
PWP:
$698.88M
HLNE:
$446.22M
PWP:
$52.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HLNE vs. PWP — Risk / Return Rank
HLNE
PWP
HLNE vs. PWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) and Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HLNE | PWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | -0.15 | -0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.61 | 0.09 | -1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | 1.01 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | -0.17 | -0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.72 | -0.34 | -1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HLNE | PWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.10 | -0.15 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.19 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.28 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
HLNE vs. PWP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HLNE drawdown since its inception was -57.30%, smaller than the maximum PWP drawdown of -60.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLNE and PWP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HLNE | PWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.30% | -60.44% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.04% | -33.93% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.30% | -41.33% | -15.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.30% | -60.44% | +3.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.92% | -37.53% | -19.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.94% | -20.86% | +4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.47% | 16.69% | +7.78% |
Volatility
HLNE vs. PWP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is 10.55%, while Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) has a volatility of 11.43%. This indicates that HLNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HLNE | PWP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.55% | 11.43% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.64% | 32.33% | -1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.19% | 42.86% | -4.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.99% | 41.93% | -5.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.39% | 40.93% | -4.54% |
Dividends
HLNE vs. PWP - Dividend Comparison
HLNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than PWP's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HLNE Hamilton Lane Incorporated | 2.55% | 1.57% | 1.29% | 1.53% | 2.43% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.74% | 2.20% | 1.48% |
PWP Perella Weinberg Partners | 1.73% | 1.62% | 1.17% | 2.29% | 2.86% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
HLNE vs. PWP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hamilton Lane Incorporated and Perella Weinberg Partners. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HLNE vs. PWP - Profitability Comparison
HLNE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported a gross profit of 137.70M and revenue of 198.59M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.3%.
PWP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perella Weinberg Partners reported a gross profit of 57.64M and revenue of 148.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.
HLNE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported an operating income of 86.01M and revenue of 198.59M, resulting in an operating margin of 43.3%.
PWP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perella Weinberg Partners reported an operating income of -12.90M and revenue of 148.92M, resulting in an operating margin of -8.7%.
HLNE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hamilton Lane Incorporated reported a net income of 58.37M and revenue of 198.59M, resulting in a net margin of 29.4%.
PWP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perella Weinberg Partners reported a net income of 1.49M and revenue of 148.92M, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HLNE and PWP have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWP has higher volatility (11.43%) compared to HLNE (10.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HLNE dropped -57.30% vs PWP's -60.44%.
PWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.15 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HLNE and PWP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer