PortfoliosLab logo
HLNE vs. FICO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between HLNE and FICO is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HLNE vs. FICO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HLNE:

0.49

FICO:

0.90

Sortino Ratio

HLNE:

0.98

FICO:

1.12

Omega Ratio

HLNE:

1.13

FICO:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

HLNE:

0.59

FICO:

0.78

Martin Ratio

HLNE:

1.31

FICO:

2.01

Ulcer Index

HLNE:

16.65%

FICO:

14.41%

Daily Std Dev

HLNE:

42.04%

FICO:

39.70%

Max Drawdown

HLNE:

-48.47%

FICO:

-79.26%

Current Drawdown

HLNE:

-25.64%

FICO:

-26.62%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

HLNE:

$8.20B

FICO:

$42.56B

EPS

HLNE:

$5.41

FICO:

$23.25

PE Ratio

HLNE:

27.53

FICO:

75.19

PEG Ratio

HLNE:

1.39

FICO:

1.35

PS Ratio

HLNE:

11.50

FICO:

23.12

PB Ratio

HLNE:

8.59

FICO:

82.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

HLNE:

$712.96M

FICO:

$1.84B

Gross Profit (TTM)

HLNE:

$335.56M

FICO:

$1.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

HLNE:

$270.49M

FICO:

$829.07M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HLNE achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than FICO's -12.19% return.


HLNE

YTD

0.97%

1M

-7.24%

6M

-21.88%

1Y

20.35%

3Y*

31.83%

5Y*

18.45%

10Y*

N/A

FICO

YTD

-12.19%

1M

-14.64%

6M

-25.04%

1Y

35.53%

3Y*

60.80%

5Y*

32.76%

10Y*

34.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Hamilton Lane Incorporated

Fair Isaac Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HLNE vs. FICO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HLNE
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HLNE is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HLNE is 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HLNE is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HLNE is 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HLNE is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HLNE is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FICO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FICO is 7474
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FICO is 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FICO is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FICO is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FICO is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FICO is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HLNE vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HLNE Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is lower than the FICO Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HLNE and FICO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

HLNE vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison

HLNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HLNE
Hamilton Lane Incorporated
1.32%1.29%1.53%2.43%1.31%1.55%1.74%2.20%1.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.07%0.08%0.11%

Drawdowns

HLNE vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HLNE drawdown since its inception was -48.47%, smaller than the maximum FICO drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HLNE and FICO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

HLNE vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hamilton Lane Incorporated (HLNE) is 16.99%, while Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a volatility of 25.13%. This indicates that HLNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

HLNE vs. FICO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Hamilton Lane Incorporated and Fair Isaac Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20212022202320242025
197.97M
498.74M
(HLNE) Total Revenue
(FICO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items