PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRGN vs. MEDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRGN vs. MEDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon International Equity ETF (FRGN) and Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRGN achieves a 24.35% return, which is significantly higher than MEDX's 0.84% return.


FRGN

1D
-0.70%
1M
8.09%
YTD
24.35%
6M
26.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEDX

1D
0.92%
1M
2.85%
YTD
0.84%
6M
0.03%
1Y
29.45%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRGN vs. MEDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FRGN
Horizon International Equity ETF
24.35%1.47%
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
0.84%-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FRGN and MEDX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025

0.38

FRGN vs. MEDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FRGN
MEDX

Technology

28.2%

-

Financial Services

16.2%

-

Industrials

12.1%

-

Healthcare

10.1%
100.0%

Basic Materials

8.6%

-

Energy

8.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%

-

Communication Services

4.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.7%

-

Utilities

1.9%

-

Real Estate

0.9%

-

Technology

FRGN
28.2%
MEDX

-

Financial Services

FRGN
16.2%
MEDX

-

Industrials

FRGN
12.1%
MEDX

-

Healthcare

FRGN
10.1%
MEDX
100.0%

Basic Materials

FRGN
8.6%
MEDX

-

Energy

FRGN
8.0%
MEDX

-

Consumer Cyclical

FRGN
5.9%
MEDX

-

Communication Services

FRGN
4.5%
MEDX

-

Consumer Defensive

FRGN
3.7%
MEDX

-

Utilities

FRGN
1.9%
MEDX

-

Real Estate

FRGN
0.9%
MEDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRGN vs. MEDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRGN

MEDX
MEDX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
MEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRGN vs. MEDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon International Equity ETF (FRGN) and Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FRGN vs. MEDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRGNMEDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.84

0.27

+2.57

Drawdowns

FRGN vs. MEDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRGN drawdown since its inception was -12.40%, smaller than the maximum MEDX drawdown of -23.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRGN and MEDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRGNMEDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.40%

-23.10%

+10.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-5.55%

+4.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-6.72%

+4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

Volatility

FRGN vs. MEDX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRGNMEDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.33%

17.88%

+3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.33%

16.97%

+4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.33%

16.97%

+4.36%

FRGN vs. MEDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRGN has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MEDX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRGN vs. MEDX - Dividend Comparison

FRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than MEDX's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FRGN
Horizon International Equity ETF
0.20%0.25%0.00%0.00%
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
1.22%1.23%1.92%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRGN and MEDX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRGN is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRGN is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MEDX.

MEDX has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.20% for FRGN.

FRGN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while MEDX is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for FRGN and 0.85% for MEDX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRGN and MEDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer