FRGD.L vs. TDGB.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FRGD.L (Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRGD.L is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF, while TDGB.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRGD.L returned 9.46%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for TDGB.L. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRGD.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.

Performance

FRGD.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRGD.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

FRGD.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FRGD.L having a 11.68% return and TDGB.L slightly lower at 11.13%.

FRGD.L

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.07%
• 6M: 8.73%
• YTD: 11.68%
• 1Y: 19.15%
• 3Y*: 15.81%
• 5Y*: 9.46%
• 10Y*: —

TDGB.L

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: 9.77%
• YTD: 11.13%
• 1Y: 29.45%
• 3Y*: 22.34%
• 5Y*: 17.71%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRGD.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRGD.L Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF	11.68%	14.23%	15.42%	10.52%	-9.39%	19.24%	5.56%	23.88%	-8.99%	5.36%
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF	11.13%	40.77%	8.81%	14.79%	9.40%	18.51%	-2.72%	8.05%	-13.18%	9.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FRGD.L and TDGB.L is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017	0.72

The correlation between FRGD.L and TDGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (3 years) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FRGD.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRGD.L

FRGD.L Risk / Return Rank: 71
FRGD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FRGD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
FRGD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FRGD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FRGD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

TDGB.L

TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 94
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRGD.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRGD.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRGD.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.66	-0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	3.63	-0.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.48	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.74	5.79	-3.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.61	15.45	-5.83

FRGD.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRGD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRGD.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRGD.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRGD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRGD.L and TDGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRGD.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.03%	-45.20%	+10.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-5.06%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.61%	-13.68%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.51%	-18.93%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	0.00%	-0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-8.11%	+2.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	1.90%	+0.09%

Volatility

FRGD.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FRGD.L) is 2.84%, while VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) has a volatility of 3.08%. This indicates that FRGD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRGD.L	TDGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	3.08%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.99%	8.46%	-0.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.11%	11.09%	-0.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.02%	14.19%	-1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.58%	16.10%	-1.52%

FRGD.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRGD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRGD.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

FRGD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, less than TDGB.L's 3.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FRGD.L Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF	2.50%	2.69%	2.46%	2.73%	3.03%	2.36%	2.41%	3.21%	3.38%	0.44%
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF	3.15%	3.50%	4.26%	4.93%	4.40%	4.06%	4.16%	4.52%	4.38%	3.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRGD.L and TDGB.L in my portfolio?

FRGD.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRGD.L or TDGB.L?

On fees, FRGD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRGD.L or TDGB.L?

FRGD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

What is the main difference between FRGD.L and TDGB.L?

FRGD.L is categorized as Dividend, while TDGB.L is Global Equities. FRGD.L tracks Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FRGD.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.