PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRGD.L vs. IDUP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRGD.L vs. IDUP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FRGD.L) and iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRGD.L achieves a 12.51% return, which is significantly lower than IDUP.L's 19.54% return.


FRGD.L

1D
0.48%
1M
0.30%
6M
9.18%
YTD
12.51%
1Y
19.27%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
9.62%
10Y*

IDUP.L

1D
0.88%
1M
4.01%
6M
15.63%
YTD
19.54%
1Y
21.72%
3Y*
11.00%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*
4.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRGD.L vs. IDUP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRGD.L
Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
12.51%14.23%15.42%10.52%-9.39%19.24%5.56%23.88%-8.99%5.36%
IDUP.L
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
19.54%2.23%4.73%13.04%-24.29%41.77%-10.91%21.39%-4.82%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FRGD.L and IDUP.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017

0.54

The correlation between FRGD.L and IDUP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRGD.L vs. IDUP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRGD.L
FRGD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FRGD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IDUP.L
IDUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IDUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRGD.L vs. IDUP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FRGD.L) and iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRGD.LIDUP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.29

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.76

2.92

-0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

8.01

+1.65

FRGD.L vs. IDUP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRGD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the IDUP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRGD.L and IDUP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRGD.L vs. IDUP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRGD.L drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum IDUP.L drawdown of -75.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRGD.L and IDUP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRGD.LIDUP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-75.24%

+40.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.95%

-7.41%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.61%

-20.33%

+7.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.51%

-33.70%

+11.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

0.00%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-15.31%

+10.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.70%

-0.71%

Volatility

FRGD.L vs. IDUP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (FRGD.L) is 2.49%, while iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L) has a volatility of 4.33%. This indicates that FRGD.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDUP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRGD.LIDUP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.49%

4.33%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

9.99%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.11%

13.15%

-3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.01%

18.39%

-5.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.57%

20.36%

-5.79%

FRGD.L vs. IDUP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRGD.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IDUP.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRGD.L vs. IDUP.L - Dividend Comparison

FRGD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.48%, less than IDUP.L's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRGD.L
Franklin Global Quality Dividend UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.48%2.69%2.46%2.73%3.03%2.36%2.41%3.21%3.38%0.44%0.00%0.00%
IDUP.L
iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.81%3.20%3.09%3.13%3.84%2.13%3.22%3.10%4.60%3.17%3.55%2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRGD.L and IDUP.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FRGD.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRGD.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDUP.L.

FRGD.L is categorized as Dividend, while IDUP.L is REIT. FRGD.L tracks LibertyQ Global Dividend Index-NR, while IDUP.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit US Dividend+ Net of Tax Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: Franklin and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for FRGD.L and 0.40% for IDUP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRGD.L and IDUP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer