IDUP.L vs. EPRA.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

IDUP.L (iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and EPRA.L (Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR) are both REIT funds - IDUP.L tracks the iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) while EPRA.L tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDUP.L returned 3.24%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for EPRA.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDUP.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EPRA.L.

Performance

IDUP.L vs. EPRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

IDUP.L is traded in USD, while EPRA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EPRA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDUP.L achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than EPRA.L's 10.75% return.

IDUP.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.06%
• 6M: 14.44%
• YTD: 16.04%
• 1Y: 18.31%
• 3Y*: 9.47%
• 5Y*: 3.24%
• 10Y*: 4.11%

EPRA.L

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: 1.00%
• 6M: 9.05%
• YTD: 10.75%
• 1Y: 15.84%
• 3Y*: 8.93%
• 5Y*: 1.28%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDUP.L vs. EPRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDUP.L iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	16.04%	2.23%	4.73%	13.04%	-24.29%	41.77%	-10.91%	21.39%	-4.82%	4.35%
EPRA.L Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR	10.75%	10.90%	-0.38%	9.91%	-25.00%	26.68%	-9.29%	22.00%	-6.19%	-5.56%

Correlation

The correlation between IDUP.L and EPRA.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2016	0.85

The correlation between IDUP.L and EPRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

IDUP.L vs. EPRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDUP.L

IDUP.L Risk / Return Rank: 52
IDUP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
IDUP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IDUP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 46
IDUP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IDUP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 50

EPRA.L

EPRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
EPRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
EPRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
EPRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 43
EPRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
EPRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDUP.L vs. EPRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L) and Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDUP.L	EPRA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.35	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	1.98	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	1.50	+0.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.81	5.47	+1.35

IDUP.L vs. EPRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDUP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the EPRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDUP.L and EPRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDUP.L vs. EPRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDUP.L drawdown since its inception was -75.24%, which is greater than EPRA.L's maximum drawdown of -42.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDUP.L and EPRA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDUP.L	EPRA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-75.24%	-42.78%	-32.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.41%	-10.50%	+3.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.33%	-18.35%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.70%	-33.59%	-0.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.41%	-0.44%	-0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.31%	-13.18%	-2.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	2.89%	-0.19%

Volatility

IDUP.L vs. EPRA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDUP.L) has a higher volatility of 3.92% compared to Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR (EPRA.L) at 3.24%. This indicates that IDUP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EPRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDUP.L	EPRA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.92%	3.24%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.76%	9.36%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.96%	11.67%	+1.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.37%	15.96%	+2.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.35%	17.44%	+2.91%

IDUP.L vs. EPRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDUP.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EPRA.L's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDUP.L vs. EPRA.L - Dividend Comparison

IDUP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while EPRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EPRA.L Amundi Index FTSE EPRA NAREIT Global UCITS ETF DR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IDUP.L iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist)	2.90%	3.20%	3.09%	3.13%	3.84%	2.13%	3.22%	3.10%	4.60%	3.17%	3.55%	2.98%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDUP.L and EPRA.L in my portfolio?

IDUP.L and EPRA.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, IDUP.L or EPRA.L?

On fees, EPRA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDUP.L or EPRA.L?

EPRA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDUP.L.

What is the main difference between IDUP.L and EPRA.L?

IDUP.L tracks iShares US Property Yield UCITS ETF USD (Dist), while EPRA.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDUP.L and 0.10% for EPRA.L.