PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRFZX vs. CFOIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRFZX vs. CFOIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) and Calvert Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (CFOIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRFZX achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than CFOIX's -0.04% return.


FRFZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.65%
YTD
2.29%
6M
3.07%
1Y
6.22%
3Y*
8.74%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
5.36%

CFOIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.01%
YTD
-0.04%
6M
0.01%
1Y
3.05%
3Y*
6.66%
5Y*
4.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRFZX vs. CFOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FRFZX
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund
2.29%5.66%9.45%14.11%-3.56%5.46%4.62%7.47%-1.40%
CFOIX
Calvert Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
-0.04%3.48%8.92%12.09%-4.21%4.37%0.62%9.36%-2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FRFZX and CFOIX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2018

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between FRFZX and CFOIX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRFZX vs. CFOIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRFZX
FRFZX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FRFZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRFZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRFZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FRFZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRFZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

CFOIX
CFOIX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CFOIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CFOIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CFOIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CFOIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
CFOIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRFZX vs. CFOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) and Calvert Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (CFOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRFZXCFOIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.69

1.57

+1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

6.64

3.46

+3.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.02

1.56

+0.46

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.34

3.46

+3.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.93

8.77

+14.16

FRFZX vs. CFOIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRFZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the CFOIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRFZX and CFOIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRFZXCFOIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.57

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.89

1.41

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

0.80

+0.61

Drawdowns

FRFZX vs. CFOIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRFZX drawdown since its inception was -21.95%, roughly equal to the maximum CFOIX drawdown of -22.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRFZX and CFOIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRFZXCFOIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.95%

-22.38%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.85%

-0.88%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.12%

-3.18%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.85%

-7.93%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.27%

+0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.91%

-1.30%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.27%

0.35%

-0.08%

Volatility

FRFZX vs. CFOIX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund (FRFZX) has a higher volatility of 0.59% compared to Calvert Floating-Rate Advantage Fund (CFOIX) at 0.39%. This indicates that FRFZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRFZXCFOIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.59%

0.39%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.59%

1.26%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33%

1.95%

+0.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.09%

3.06%

+0.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.97%

4.75%

-0.78%

FRFZX vs. CFOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRFZX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than CFOIX's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRFZX vs. CFOIX - Dividend Comparison

FRFZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, more than CFOIX's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CFOIX
Calvert Floating-Rate Advantage Fund
5.89%6.88%8.62%7.42%5.02%3.96%4.23%5.05%4.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRFZX
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund
7.40%7.65%8.76%8.87%6.41%3.33%5.35%5.42%5.06%4.90%4.34%3.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRFZX and CFOIX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRFZX has higher volatility (0.59%) compared to CFOIX (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRFZX dropped -21.95% vs CFOIX's -22.38%.

FRFZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRFZX and CFOIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer