PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FREY vs. BLNK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FREY vs. BLNK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FREYR Battery (FREY) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FREY achieves a 80.24% return, which is significantly higher than BLNK's 19.06% return.


FREY

1D
15.66%
1M
133.79%
YTD
80.24%
6M
154.01%
1Y
1,046.67%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
10Y*

BLNK

1D
-5.85%
1M
7.75%
YTD
19.06%
6M
-36.98%
1Y
11.62%
3Y*
-50.90%
5Y*
-54.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FREY vs. BLNK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FREY
FREYR Battery
80.24%158.91%37.97%-78.46%-22.36%18.31%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
19.06%-52.01%-59.00%-69.10%-58.62%-25.28%

Correlation

The correlation between FREY and BLNK is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2021

0.46

The correlation between FREY and BLNK shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FREY:

$2.63B

BLNK:

$113.68M

EPS

FREY:

-$2.15

BLNK:

-$0.63

PS Ratio

FREY:

12.67

BLNK:

0.90

PB Ratio

FREY:

11.31

BLNK:

2.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

FREY:

$168.46M

BLNK:

$103.40M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FREY:

$66.78M

BLNK:

$24.62M

EBITDA (TTM)

FREY:

-$133.32M

BLNK:

-$58.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FREY vs. BLNK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FREY
FREY Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FREY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FREY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
FREY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
FREY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FREY Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

BLNK
BLNK Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BLNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLNK Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BLNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLNK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FREY vs. BLNK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FREYR Battery (FREY) and Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FREYBLNKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

8.33

0.12

+8.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.83

0.99

+3.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.10

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

17.15

0.16

+16.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

41.61

0.25

+41.36

FREY vs. BLNK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FREY Sharpe Ratio is 8.33, which is higher than the BLNK Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FREY and BLNK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FREYBLNKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.33

0.12

+8.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

-0.21

+0.26

Drawdowns

FREY vs. BLNK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FREY drawdown since its inception was -94.09%, smaller than the maximum BLNK drawdown of -99.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FREY and BLNK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FREYBLNKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.09%

-99.17%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.59%

-79.94%

+21.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-90.35%

-92.69%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.12%

-98.69%

+73.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.40%

-73.00%

+12.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.15%

51.81%

-27.66%

Volatility

FREY vs. BLNK - Volatility Comparison

FREYR Battery (FREY) has a higher volatility of 45.89% compared to Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) at 30.46%. This indicates that FREY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLNK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FREYBLNKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.89%

30.46%

+15.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.50%

68.16%

+20.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

127.14%

98.36%

+28.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

100.97%

83.06%

+17.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

100.97%

121.52%

-20.55%

Dividends

FREY vs. BLNK - Dividend Comparison

Neither FREY nor BLNK has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

FREY vs. BLNK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FREYR Battery and Blink Charging Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-50.00M0.0050.00M100.00M20222023202420252026
-41.84M
20.78M
(FREY) Total Revenue
(BLNK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FREY and BLNK have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FREY has higher volatility (45.89%) compared to BLNK (30.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FREY dropped -94.09% vs BLNK's -99.17%.

FREY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.33 vs 0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FREY and BLNK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer