FREL vs. IVRA
FREL (Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF) and IVRA (Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FREL is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Real Estate Index, while IVRA is a ESG fund actively managed by Invesco. FREL is passively managed, while IVRA is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FREL returned 2.09%/yr vs 7.62%/yr for IVRA. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FREL charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IVRA.
Performance
FREL vs. IVRA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FREL achieves a 7.59% return, which is significantly lower than IVRA's 11.70% return.
FREL
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- 5.67%
IVRA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- —
FREL vs. IVRA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 7.59% | 3.09% | 5.05% | 11.74% | -26.21% | 40.46% | 1.60% |
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 11.70% | 10.20% | 13.07% | 9.13% | -10.00% | 32.74% | 1.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between FREL and IVRA is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2020 | 0.85 |
The correlation between FREL and IVRA shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FREL vs. IVRA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FREL
IVRA
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
Technology
-
Energy
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
FREL
IVRA
Basic Materials
FREL
IVRA
Communication Services
FREL
IVRA
-
Technology
FREL
IVRA
-
Energy
FREL
IVRA
Financial Services
FREL
IVRA
Consumer Cyclical
FREL
-
IVRA
Consumer Defensive
FREL
-
IVRA
Healthcare
FREL
-
IVRA
-
Industrials
FREL
-
IVRA
-
Utilities
FREL
-
IVRA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FREL vs. IVRA — Risk / Return Rank
FREL
IVRA
FREL vs. IVRA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) and Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FREL | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.36 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 3.46 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 12.02 | -8.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FREL | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.72 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.46 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.73 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
FREL vs. IVRA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FREL drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than IVRA's maximum drawdown of -25.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FREL and IVRA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FREL | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.61% | -25.99% | -16.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -4.60% | -3.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.54% | -15.03% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.40% | -25.99% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -0.92% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -7.27% | -2.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 1.32% | +1.36% |
Volatility
FREL vs. IVRA - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF (FREL) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF (IVRA) at 0.00%. This indicates that FREL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVRA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FREL | IVRA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.75% | 0.00% | +3.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.27% | 5.45% | +3.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 9.27% | +3.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 16.58% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.67% | 16.39% | +4.28% |
FREL vs. IVRA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FREL has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than IVRA's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FREL vs. IVRA - Dividend Comparison
FREL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than IVRA's 16.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FREL Fidelity MSCI Real Estate Index ETF | 3.34% | 3.59% | 3.48% | 3.73% | 3.57% | 2.34% | 3.77% | 3.32% | 5.54% | 3.27% | 4.01% | 3.80% |
IVRA Invesco Real Assets ESG ETF | 16.99% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 2.47% | 2.30% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FREL and IVRA have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FREL has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to IVRA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FREL dropped -42.61% vs IVRA's -25.99%.
On 5-year performance, IVRA leads with 7.62% vs 2.09% for FREL. On fees, FREL is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IVRA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IVRA has performed better with a 7.62% return vs 2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FREL is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA has the higher dividend yield at 16.99%, compared with 3.34% for FREL.
FREL is categorized as REIT, while IVRA is ESG. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FREL and 0.59% for IVRA.
IVRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FREL and IVRA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer