PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRDPX vs. FAFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRDPX vs. FAFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A (FAFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRDPX achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly higher than FAFRX's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FRDPX has outperformed FAFRX with an annualized return of 11.41%, while FAFRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.14% annualized return.


FRDPX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.39%
YTD
5.86%
6M
5.39%
1Y
15.37%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
8.57%
10Y*
11.41%

FAFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.59%
YTD
1.07%
6M
0.97%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
7.39%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
4.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRDPX vs. FAFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
5.86%11.96%10.92%12.10%-10.69%26.62%16.29%29.83%-5.27%17.33%
FAFRX
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A
1.07%4.41%8.25%14.10%-1.75%8.41%-4.37%3.17%0.57%2.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FRDPX and FAFRX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2001

0.13

The correlation between FRDPX and FAFRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (all time) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRDPX vs. FAFRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRDPX
FRDPX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
FRDPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRDPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRDPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
FRDPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRDPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FAFRX
FAFRX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FAFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FAFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRDPX vs. FAFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) and Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A (FAFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRDPXFAFRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.28

1.83

+0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

5.44

+3.47

FRDPX vs. FAFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRDPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is higher than the FAFRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRDPX and FAFRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRDPXFAFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

1.12

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

1.77

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

1.08

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

1.13

-0.51

Drawdowns

FRDPX vs. FAFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRDPX drawdown since its inception was -51.57%, which is greater than FAFRX's maximum drawdown of -25.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDPX and FAFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRDPXFAFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.57%

-25.94%

-25.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-1.78%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.26%

-2.86%

-15.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.07%

-6.28%

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.89%

-18.09%

-16.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-1.57%

-4.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

0.59%

+1.23%

Volatility

FRDPX vs. FAFRX - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Rising Dividends Fund (FRDPX) has a higher volatility of 2.29% compared to Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A (FAFRX) at 0.78%. This indicates that FRDPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAFRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRDPXFAFRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

0.78%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

2.15%

+5.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.15%

2.91%

+7.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.36%

3.31%

+12.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

3.84%

+13.34%

FRDPX vs. FAFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRDPX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FAFRX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRDPX vs. FAFRX - Dividend Comparison

FRDPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, more than FAFRX's 7.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAFRX
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A
7.61%7.76%9.17%7.43%5.59%3.47%4.52%5.38%4.92%3.55%4.33%4.84%
FRDPX
Franklin Rising Dividends Fund
9.66%10.25%10.15%4.60%4.96%4.42%0.82%3.01%5.20%0.90%3.09%5.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRDPX and FAFRX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRDPX has higher volatility (2.29%) compared to FAFRX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRDPX dropped -51.57% vs FAFRX's -25.94%.

FRDPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRDPX and FAFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer