PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAFRX vs. BSTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAFRX vs. BSTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A (FAFRX) and BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAFRX achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than BSTZ's 31.54% return.


FAFRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.14%
6M
1.37%
YTD
1.39%
1Y
2.35%
3Y*
6.31%
5Y*
5.79%
10Y*
3.98%
ALL TIME*
3.52%

BSTZ

1D
1.75%
1M
-2.73%
6M
31.94%
YTD
31.54%
1Y
48.48%
3Y*
27.39%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$5.36M$5.75M$6.87M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FAFRX vs. BSTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FAFRX
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A
1.39%4.41%8.25%14.10%-1.75%8.41%-4.37%0.73%
BSTZ
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust
31.54%25.06%37.49%18.72%-55.34%12.71%87.46%5.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FAFRX and BSTZ is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAFRX vs. BSTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAFRX
FAFRX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FAFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FAFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

BSTZ
BSTZ Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BSTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BSTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAFRX vs. BSTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A (FAFRX) and BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAFRXBSTZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.08

-1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.71

11.02

-6.31

FAFRX vs. BSTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAFRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the BSTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAFRX and BSTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAFRX vs. BSTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAFRX drawdown since its inception was -25.94%, smaller than the maximum BSTZ drawdown of -60.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAFRX and BSTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAFRXBSTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.94%

-60.51%

+34.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.78%

-15.70%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.86%

-25.31%

+22.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.28%

-60.51%

+54.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-9.76%

+9.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-27.10%

+25.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

4.37%

-3.77%

Volatility

FAFRX vs. BSTZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A (FAFRX) is 0.28%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust (BSTZ) has a volatility of 11.22%. This indicates that FAFRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAFRXBSTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.28%

11.22%

-10.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.97%

24.68%

-22.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94%

27.75%

-24.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.31%

28.28%

-24.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.84%

30.47%

-26.63%

Dividends

FAFRX vs. BSTZ - Dividend Comparison

FAFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, less than BSTZ's 8.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSTZ
BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust
8.49%12.46%9.75%10.90%14.73%5.14%3.42%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FAFRX
Franklin Floating Rate Daily Access Fund Class A
7.01%7.76%9.17%7.43%5.59%3.47%4.52%5.38%4.92%3.55%4.33%4.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAFRX and BSTZ have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BSTZ has higher volatility (11.22%) compared to FAFRX (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAFRX dropped -25.94% vs BSTZ's -60.51%.

BSTZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAFRX and BSTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer