FRDM vs. EMCR
Compare and contrast key facts about Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR).
FRDM and EMCR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FRDM is a passively managed fund by Freedom Funds that tracks the performance of the Life + Liberty Freedom 100 Emerging Markets Index. It was launched on May 22, 2019. EMCR is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Solactive ISS Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction & Climate Improvers Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Dec 6, 2018. Both FRDM and EMCR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FRDM vs. EMCR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRDM vs. EMCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 7.05% | 61.27% | 1.70% | 22.77% | -14.45% | 6.13% | 16.90% | 12.33% |
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 1.10% | 33.25% | 9.69% | 10.55% | -18.73% | 5.54% | 13.49% | 13.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRDM achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than EMCR's 1.10% return.
FRDM
- 1D
- 4.49%
- 1M
- -12.64%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 24.68%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 26.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.99%
- 10Y*
- —
EMCR
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- -9.79%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 3.97%
- 1Y
- 30.14%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.80%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRDM vs. EMCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRDM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EMCR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRDM vs. EMCR — Risk / Return Rank
FRDM
EMCR
FRDM vs. EMCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) and Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRDM | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.55 | 1.45 | +1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.15 | 2.02 | +1.13 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.30 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.15 | +1.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.69 | 8.39 | +6.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRDM | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55 | 1.45 | +1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.31 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.47 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRDM and EMCR is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRDM vs. EMCR - Dividend Comparison
FRDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than EMCR's 2.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRDM Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF | 2.04% | 2.26% | 2.53% | 2.66% | 2.72% | 2.17% | 1.11% | 1.07% | 0.00% |
EMCR Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF | 2.40% | 2.43% | 6.62% | 1.95% | 3.05% | 1.83% | 1.75% | 3.15% | 0.19% |
Drawdowns
FRDM vs. EMCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRDM drawdown since its inception was -40.49%, which is greater than EMCR's maximum drawdown of -34.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRDM and EMCR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRDM | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.49% | -34.28% | -6.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.87% | -13.84% | -3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.25% | -34.28% | +5.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.13% | -10.99% | -2.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.21% | -9.49% | +2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 3.55% | +0.49% |
Volatility
FRDM vs. EMCR - Volatility Comparison
Freedom 100 Emerging Markets ETF (FRDM) has a higher volatility of 13.19% compared to Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) at 10.62%. This indicates that FRDM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRDM | EMCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.19% | 10.62% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 14.85% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.57% | 20.88% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.00% | 18.82% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 19.68% | +2.68% |