PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRCJ.DE vs. LYY4.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRCJ.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) and Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRCJ.DE achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly lower than LYY4.DE's 17.81% return. Over the past 10 years, FRCJ.DE has underperformed LYY4.DE with an annualized return of 7.71%, while LYY4.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.45% annualized return.


FRCJ.DE

1D
-1.54%
1M
3.48%
6M
11.09%
YTD
16.62%
1Y
35.68%
3Y*
15.30%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
7.71%

LYY4.DE

1D
-1.00%
1M
1.86%
6M
11.80%
YTD
17.81%
1Y
35.81%
3Y*
16.80%
5Y*
9.78%
10Y*
8.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRCJ.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRCJ.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
16.62%13.40%13.07%10.16%-14.97%4.12%9.94%28.93%-12.80%8.84%
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
17.81%13.10%12.42%15.45%-11.19%8.61%3.15%20.96%-11.07%10.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FRCJ.DE and LYY4.DE is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 27, 2015

0.89

The correlation between FRCJ.DE and LYY4.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRCJ.DE vs. LYY4.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRCJ.DE
FRCJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRCJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

LYY4.DE
LYY4.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYY4.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRCJ.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) and Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRCJ.DELYY4.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

3.71

-0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.61

12.30

-0.69

FRCJ.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the LYY4.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRCJ.DE and LYY4.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRCJ.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRCJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, smaller than the maximum LYY4.DE drawdown of -54.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRCJ.DE and LYY4.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRCJ.DELYY4.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.67%

-54.07%

+27.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.45%

-9.61%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.98%

-15.82%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.04%

-19.34%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.67%

-28.62%

+1.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.05%

-2.08%

+0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-14.28%

+7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

2.90%

+0.17%

Volatility

FRCJ.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist (LYY4.DE) at 5.63%. This indicates that FRCJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYY4.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRCJ.DELYY4.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

5.63%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.25%

15.06%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.00%

18.44%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.57%

16.25%

+0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.49%

16.24%

+0.25%

FRCJ.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRCJ.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LYY4.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FRCJ.DE vs. LYY4.DE - Dividend Comparison

FRCJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than LYY4.DE's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRCJ.DE
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis
0.98%1.78%1.62%1.59%1.82%1.31%1.40%1.44%1.61%1.43%1.26%0.00%
LYY4.DE
Amundi Japan TOPIX II UCITS ETF EUR Dist
0.60%0.71%0.74%1.24%1.89%1.34%1.14%1.94%1.86%1.44%1.98%1.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FRCJ.DE and LYY4.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FRCJ.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FRCJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LYY4.DE.

FRCJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while LYY4.DE tracks TOPIX®. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRCJ.DE and 0.45% for LYY4.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRCJ.DE and LYY4.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer