FRCJ.DE vs. AW1C.DE

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

FRCJ.DE (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis) and AW1C.DE (UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - FRCJ.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while AW1C.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500® ESG Elite. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FRCJ.DE returned 7.85%/yr vs 15.00%/yr for AW1C.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRCJ.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AW1C.DE.

Performance

FRCJ.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRCJ.DE achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly lower than AW1C.DE's 23.32% return.

FRCJ.DE

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: 3.48%
• 6M: 11.09%
• YTD: 16.62%
• 1Y: 35.68%
• 3Y*: 15.30%
• 5Y*: 7.85%
• 10Y*: 7.71%

AW1C.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.10%
• 6M: 21.24%
• YTD: 23.32%
• 1Y: 38.76%
• 3Y*: 21.70%
• 5Y*: 15.00%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRCJ.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FRCJ.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis	16.62%	13.40%	13.07%	10.16%	-14.97%	-1.19%
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	23.32%	6.94%	24.89%	24.93%	-14.50%	11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FRCJ.DE and AW1C.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2021	0.53

The correlation between FRCJ.DE and AW1C.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FRCJ.DE vs. AW1C.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRCJ.DE

FRCJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 75
FRCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FRCJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FRCJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FRCJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
FRCJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77

AW1C.DE

AW1C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 58
AW1C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
AW1C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
AW1C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
AW1C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
AW1C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRCJ.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) and UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FRCJ.DE	AW1C.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.49	+0.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.61	2.25	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.44	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	2.30	+1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.61	4.37	+7.24

FRCJ.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRCJ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the AW1C.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRCJ.DE and AW1C.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FRCJ.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRCJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.67%, which is greater than AW1C.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRCJ.DE and AW1C.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRCJ.DE	AW1C.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.67%	-22.40%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.45%	-16.86%	+6.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.98%	-22.40%	+5.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.04%	-22.40%	+0.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-26.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-3.05%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.17%	-6.34%	-0.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	8.88%	-5.81%

Volatility

FRCJ.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis (FRCJ.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (AW1C.DE) at 5.61%. This indicates that FRCJ.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AW1C.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRCJ.DE	AW1C.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.28%	5.61%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.25%	11.13%	+4.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.00%	26.01%	-7.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.57%	18.58%	-2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.49%	19.47%	-2.98%

FRCJ.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRCJ.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than AW1C.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FRCJ.DE vs. AW1C.DE - Dividend Comparison

FRCJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while AW1C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AW1C.DE UBS ETF (IE) S&P 500 ESG Elite UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FRCJ.DE UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Japan Socially Responsible UCITS ETF (JPY) A-dis	0.98%	1.78%	1.62%	1.59%	1.82%	1.31%	1.40%	1.44%	1.61%	1.43%	1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRCJ.DE and AW1C.DE in my portfolio?

FRCJ.DE and AW1C.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRCJ.DE or AW1C.DE?

On fees, AW1C.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRCJ.DE or AW1C.DE?

AW1C.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FRCJ.DE.

What is the main difference between FRCJ.DE and AW1C.DE?

FRCJ.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while AW1C.DE is S&P 500. FRCJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan SRI Low Carbon Select 5% Issuer Capped, while AW1C.DE tracks S&P 500® ESG Elite. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for FRCJ.DE and 0.15% for AW1C.DE.