FRBVX vs. PLTZX
FRBVX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2070 Fund Investor Class) and PLTZX (Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past year, FRBVX returned 27.27% vs 21.70% for PLTZX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FRBVX charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for PLTZX.
Performance
FRBVX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRBVX achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly higher than PLTZX's 8.71% return.
FRBVX
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 11.75%
- 6M
- 12.37%
- 1Y
- 27.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTZX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 8.71%
- 6M
- 9.08%
- 1Y
- 21.70%
- 3Y*
- 18.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.53%
FRBVX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FRBVX Fidelity Freedom Index 2070 Fund Investor Class | 11.75% | 21.43% | 1.95% |
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund | 8.71% | 17.76% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRBVX and PLTZX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2024 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FRBVX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRBVX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank
FRBVX
PLTZX
FRBVX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2070 Fund Investor Class (FRBVX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRBVX | PLTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.34 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 2.51 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.61 | 11.31 | +2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRBVX | PLTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 1.85 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.70 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
FRBVX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRBVX drawdown since its inception was -14.69%, smaller than the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBVX and PLTZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRBVX | PLTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.69% | -34.01% | +19.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.08% | -8.70% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.73% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -0.87% | +0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.70% | -4.63% | +2.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 1.93% | +0.11% |
Volatility
FRBVX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom Index 2070 Fund Investor Class (FRBVX) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) at 3.44%. This indicates that FRBVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRBVX | PLTZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 3.44% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 9.47% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.70% | 11.83% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 15.47% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 15.99% | -1.78% |
FRBVX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRBVX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FRBVX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison
FRBVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than PLTZX's 7.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBVX Fidelity Freedom Index 2070 Fund Investor Class | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund | 7.67% | 8.33% | 7.85% | 4.12% | 8.44% | 5.29% | 3.60% | 5.86% | 5.75% | 2.73% | 3.48% | 3.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FRBVX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FRBVX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to PLTZX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRBVX dropped -14.69% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.
FRBVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRBVX and PLTZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer