FRBSX vs. NMAVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX).
FRBSX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Apr 2, 1990. NMAVX is managed by Nuance Investments. It was launched on Dec 31, 2013.
Performance
FRBSX vs. NMAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRBSX vs. NMAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBSX Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.37% | 6.57% | 10.78% | 9.00% | -6.81% | 26.62% | -2.40% | 24.53% | -12.64% | 12.50% |
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.25% | 1.91% | 5.20% | 6.44% | -5.26% | 11.10% | 4.41% | 30.71% | -5.44% | 14.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRBSX achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than NMAVX's 2.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FRBSX having a 8.04% annualized return and NMAVX not far behind at 7.70%.
FRBSX
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 5.38%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.04%
NMAVX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 9.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRBSX vs. NMAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRBSX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is lower than NMAVX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRBSX vs. NMAVX — Risk / Return Rank
FRBSX
NMAVX
FRBSX vs. NMAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRBSX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 0.74 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.65 | 1.18 | -0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.14 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.59 | 1.08 | -0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.97 | 3.32 | -1.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRBSX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 0.74 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.23 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.51 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.51 | +0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRBSX and NMAVX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRBSX vs. NMAVX - Dividend Comparison
FRBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than NMAVX's 0.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBSX Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund | 4.59% | 4.60% | 8.44% | 2.32% | 4.39% | 13.02% | 3.71% | 7.88% | 16.87% | 8.07% | 6.60% | 17.29% |
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.97% | 1.00% | 7.55% | 1.78% | 9.05% | 11.98% | 0.61% | 5.91% | 7.16% | 7.05% | 1.83% | 4.24% |
Drawdowns
FRBSX vs. NMAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRBSX drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, which is greater than NMAVX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBSX and NMAVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRBSX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -30.93% | -32.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -9.80% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -18.40% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.69% | -30.93% | -12.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.83% | -7.63% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.16% | -3.77% | -4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.89% | 3.18% | +0.71% |
Volatility
FRBSX vs. NMAVX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) has a higher volatility of 4.91% compared to Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) at 3.69%. This indicates that FRBSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRBSX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 3.69% | +1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.80% | 7.60% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.07% | 14.28% | +3.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 13.21% | +4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 15.04% | +4.27% |