FRBSX vs. FIMVX
FRBSX (Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund) and FIMVX (Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FRBSX returned 6.28%/yr vs 9.29%/yr for FIMVX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FRBSX charges 0.91%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FIMVX.
Performance
FRBSX vs. FIMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRBSX achieves a 9.72% return, which is significantly lower than FIMVX's 17.73% return.
FRBSX
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- 6M
- 9.72%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 10.45%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
FIMVX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 17.73%
- YTD
- 17.73%
- 1Y
- 24.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 9.29%
- 10Y*
- —
FRBSX vs. FIMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBSX Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund | 9.72% | 6.57% | 10.78% | 9.00% | -6.81% | 26.62% | -2.40% | 7.39% |
FIMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund | 17.73% | 11.01% | 13.02% | 12.75% | -12.08% | 28.21% | 4.74% | 7.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRBSX and FIMVX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.96 |
The correlation between FRBSX and FIMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRBSX vs. FIMVX — Risk / Return Rank
FRBSX
FIMVX
FRBSX vs. FIMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRBSX | FIMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 3.38 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.09 | 12.62 | -9.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRBSX vs. FIMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRBSX drawdown since its inception was -63.47%, which is greater than FIMVX's maximum drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBSX and FIMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRBSX | FIMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.47% | -43.61% | -19.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -7.52% | -2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.29% | -20.40% | +3.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.76% | -21.23% | -0.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.69% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.70% | -0.66% | -1.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.12% | -6.36% | -1.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 2.01% | +1.51% |
Volatility
FRBSX vs. FIMVX - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund (FRBSX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund (FIMVX) have volatilities of 4.62% and 4.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRBSX | FIMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 4.68% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 10.21% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 13.59% | +0.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 17.35% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.24% | 21.78% | -2.54% |
FRBSX vs. FIMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRBSX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than FIMVX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRBSX vs. FIMVX - Dividend Comparison
FRBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than FIMVX's 2.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIMVX Fidelity Mid Cap Value Index Fund | 2.11% | 2.48% | 4.44% | 1.89% | 2.75% | 5.62% | 1.23% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FRBSX Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value Fund | 4.20% | 4.60% | 8.44% | 2.32% | 4.39% | 13.02% | 3.71% | 7.88% | 16.87% | 8.07% | 6.60% | 17.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FRBSX and FIMVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FIMVX has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to FRBSX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRBSX dropped -63.47% vs FIMVX's -43.61%.
FIMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRBSX and FIMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer