FRBHX vs. PLTHX
FRBHX (Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6) and PLTHX (Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past year, FRBHX returned 31.41% vs 28.05% for PLTHX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FRBHX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PLTHX.
Performance
FRBHX vs. PLTHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRBHX achieves a 13.94% return, which is significantly higher than PLTHX's 11.70% return.
FRBHX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 15.91%
- 1Y
- 31.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PLTHX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 28.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
FRBHX vs. PLTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FRBHX Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 | 13.94% | 23.65% | 3.64% |
PLTHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund | 11.70% | 19.91% | 5.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRBHX and PLTHX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2024 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FRBHX and PLTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRBHX vs. PLTHX — Risk / Return Rank
FRBHX
PLTHX
FRBHX vs. PLTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRBHX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.44 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 3.34 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.55 | 15.30 | -0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRBHX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.50 | 2.41 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.68 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.42 | 0.69 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
FRBHX vs. PLTHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRBHX drawdown since its inception was -15.29%, smaller than the maximum PLTHX drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBHX and PLTHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRBHX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.29% | -33.26% | +17.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.77% | -8.60% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.49% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.78% | -4.81% | +3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 1.87% | +0.32% |
Volatility
FRBHX vs. PLTHX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 (FRBHX) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) at 3.42%. This indicates that FRBHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRBHX | PLTHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 3.42% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 9.46% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.78% | 11.93% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 15.50% | +0.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 15.97% | -0.17% |
FRBHX vs. PLTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRBHX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTHX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRBHX vs. PLTHX - Dividend Comparison
FRBHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, more than PLTHX's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBHX Fidelity Freedom® 2070 Fund Class K6 | 4.20% | 2.53% | 2.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLTHX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund | 3.91% | 4.37% | 4.30% | 2.76% | 7.91% | 3.84% | 2.91% | 3.67% | 3.47% | 2.37% | 2.20% | 1.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FRBHX and PLTHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FRBHX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to PLTHX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRBHX dropped -15.29% vs PLTHX's -33.26%.
FRBHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRBHX and PLTHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer