FRBAX vs. FFSIX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX).
FRBAX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jan 3, 1992. FFSIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Sep 3, 1996.
Performance
FRBAX vs. FFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRBAX vs. FFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund | 0.80% | 11.07% | 22.54% | -1.93% | -12.25% | 40.51% | -10.11% | 27.60% | -17.61% | 10.32% |
FFSIX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I | -7.26% | 15.23% | 39.62% | 14.33% | -8.71% | 33.30% | 0.06% | 34.10% | -15.84% | 20.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRBAX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than FFSIX's -7.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FRBAX has underperformed FFSIX with an annualized return of 9.75%, while FFSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.28% annualized return.
FRBAX
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.59%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
FFSIX
- 1D
- 2.34%
- 1M
- -3.89%
- YTD
- -7.26%
- 6M
- -2.51%
- 1Y
- 7.10%
- 3Y*
- 21.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FRBAX vs. FFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRBAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than FFSIX's 0.76% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FRBAX vs. FFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
FRBAX
FFSIX
FRBAX vs. FFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) and Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRBAX | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.34 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 0.59 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 0.56 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | 1.73 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRBAX | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.34 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.55 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | 0.56 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.31 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRBAX and FFSIX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FRBAX vs. FFSIX - Dividend Comparison
FRBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than FFSIX's 7.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund | 8.72% | 8.82% | 9.72% | 2.65% | 5.83% | 5.26% | 2.43% | 1.75% | 1.92% | 1.76% | 2.94% | 4.42% |
FFSIX Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I | 7.48% | 6.94% | 9.90% | 2.45% | 6.01% | 4.31% | 2.61% | 1.43% | 4.23% | 0.06% | 0.32% | 0.63% |
Drawdowns
FRBAX vs. FFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRBAX drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, smaller than the maximum FFSIX drawdown of -75.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBAX and FFSIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRBAX | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.55% | -75.57% | +8.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.22% | -14.39% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.15% | -24.92% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.24% | -45.98% | -6.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.30% | -10.06% | -0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -17.25% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.55% | 4.66% | +0.89% |
Volatility
FRBAX vs. FFSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) is 4.88%, while Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that FRBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRBAX | FFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 5.14% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.34% | 12.64% | +3.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.54% | 21.22% | +4.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.64% | 21.17% | +5.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.30% | 23.85% | +5.45% |