PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRBA vs. NFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FRBA vs. NFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Bank (FRBA) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRBA achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly higher than NFG's 4.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FRBA has outperformed NFG with an annualized return of 10.30%, while NFG has yielded a comparatively lower 7.52% annualized return.


FRBA

1D
0.60%
1M
5.10%
6M
12.34%
YTD
13.84%
1Y
28.99%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
10.30%
ALL TIME*
3.70%

NFG

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.74%
6M
-0.46%
YTD
4.13%
1Y
-2.59%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
7.52%
ALL TIME*
9.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.91M$1.62M$1.63M
$58.89M$56.86M$61.39M

FRBA vs. NFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRBA
First Bank
13.84%18.84%-2.59%9.07%-3.61%56.47%-13.84%-7.82%-11.70%20.15%
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
4.13%35.31%25.38%-17.71%1.87%60.66%-7.58%-5.94%-3.74%-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FRBA and NFG is 0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2007

0.14

The correlation between FRBA and NFG shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FRBA:

$465.74M

NFG:

$7.82B

EPS

FRBA:

$1.70

NFG:

$7.24

PE Ratio

FRBA:

10.93

NFG:

11.38

PEG Ratio

FRBA:

1.25

NFG:

0.08

PS Ratio

FRBA:

1.89

NFG:

3.07

PB Ratio

FRBA:

1.03

NFG:

1.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

FRBA:

$245.79M

NFG:

$2.50B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FRBA:

$136.14M

NFG:

$1.23B

EBITDA (TTM)

FRBA:

$59.45M

NFG:

$1.52B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRBA vs. NFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRBA
FRBA Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FRBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRBA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
FRBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRBA Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

NFG
NFG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFG Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
NFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFG Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRBA vs. NFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Bank (FRBA) and National Fuel Gas Company (NFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRBANFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.99

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

-0.13

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.23

-0.24

+3.47

FRBA vs. NFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRBA Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the NFG Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRBA and NFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRBA vs. NFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRBA drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, which is greater than NFG's maximum drawdown of -55.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBA and NFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRBANFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.09%

-55.49%

-23.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-20.93%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.04%

-20.93%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.95%

-35.74%

-12.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.58%

-44.28%

-14.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-13.63%

+11.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.81%

-14.35%

-19.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

11.43%

-3.13%

Volatility

FRBA vs. NFG - Volatility Comparison

First Bank (FRBA) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) at 6.54%. This indicates that FRBA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRBANFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

6.54%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.20%

14.53%

+3.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.38%

19.62%

+5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.72%

22.24%

+6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.25%

24.05%

+12.20%

Dividends

FRBA vs. NFG - Dividend Comparison

FRBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than NFG's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRBA
First Bank
1.62%1.46%1.71%1.63%1.74%1.03%1.28%1.09%0.99%0.58%0.00%0.00%
NFG
National Fuel Gas Company
2.62%2.65%3.36%3.91%2.97%2.83%4.30%3.72%3.30%3.00%2.84%3.67%

Financials

FRBA vs. NFG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between First Bank and National Fuel Gas Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

FRBA vs. NFG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between First Bank and National Fuel Gas Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

FRBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Bank reported a gross profit of 34.72M and revenue of 59.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

NFG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a gross profit of 231.42M and revenue of 537.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.1%.

FRBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Bank reported an operating income of 14.58M and revenue of 59.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.5%.

NFG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported an operating income of 208.94M and revenue of 537.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.9%.

FRBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, First Bank reported a net income of 10.86M and revenue of 59.42M, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.

NFG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, National Fuel Gas Company reported a net income of 138.62M and revenue of 537.50M, resulting in a net margin of 25.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FRBA and NFG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FRBA has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to NFG (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRBA dropped -79.09% vs NFG's -55.49%.

FRBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRBA and NFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer