FRA vs. CLOZ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FRA (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc) and CLOZ (Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF) are both funds - FRA is a Bank Loan fund managed by BlackRock, while CLOZ is a CLO fund actively managed by Panagram. Over the past 3 years, FRA returned 9.06%/yr vs 10.65%/yr for CLOZ. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRA charges 2.17%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CLOZ.

Performance

FRA vs. CLOZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRA achieves a -1.74% return, which is significantly lower than CLOZ's 2.62% return.

FRA

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.07%
• YTD: -1.74%
• 6M: -1.53%
• 1Y: -2.59%
• 3Y*: 9.06%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 6.38%

CLOZ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.67%
• YTD: 2.62%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: 6.62%
• 3Y*: 10.65%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRA vs. CLOZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FRA BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc	-1.74%	-3.75%	21.56%	19.29%
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	2.62%	5.99%	11.85%	14.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FRA and CLOZ is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2023	0.10

The correlation between FRA and CLOZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FRA vs. CLOZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRA

FRA Risk / Return Rank: 2
FRA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FRA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FRA Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FRA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FRA Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CLOZ

CLOZ Risk / Return Rank: 53
CLOZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
CLOZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
CLOZ Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CLOZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CLOZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRA vs. CLOZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) and Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FRA	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.26	1.93	-2.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.31	2.47	-2.77
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	1.50	-0.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	1.70	-1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.35	5.66	-6.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FRA vs. CLOZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRA Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the CLOZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRA and CLOZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRA	CLOZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26	1.93	-2.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	2.77	-2.46

Drawdowns

FRA vs. CLOZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRA drawdown since its inception was -51.43%, which is greater than CLOZ's maximum drawdown of -5.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRA and CLOZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRA	CLOZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.43%	-5.32%	-46.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.47%	-3.90%	-11.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.77%	-5.32%	-13.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.11%	-0.03%	-10.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.21%	-0.38%	-6.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.51%	1.17%	+6.34%

Volatility

FRA vs. CLOZ - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF (CLOZ) at 0.42%. This indicates that FRA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FRA	CLOZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.05%	0.42%	+1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.25%	3.13%	+5.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.96%	3.45%	+6.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.90%	3.80%	+9.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.52%	3.80%	+11.72%

FRA vs. CLOZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRA has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOZ's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRA vs. CLOZ - Dividend Comparison

FRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.56%, more than CLOZ's 7.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLOZ Panagram Bbb-B Clo ETF	7.38%	7.63%	9.09%	8.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FRA BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc	13.56%	12.62%	10.81%	10.44%	6.88%	5.96%	7.61%	6.44%	6.90%	5.31%	5.65%	6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRA and CLOZ in my portfolio?

FRA and CLOZ have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FRA or CLOZ?

FRA has higher volatility (2.05%) compared to CLOZ (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRA dropped -51.43% vs CLOZ's -5.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLOZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.