PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FRA vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FRASMH
YTD Return22.05%48.30%
1Y Return31.66%72.60%
3Y Return (Ann)11.07%21.36%
5Y Return (Ann)10.98%34.34%
10Y Return (Ann)7.80%29.34%
Sharpe Ratio2.872.10
Sortino Ratio3.612.59
Omega Ratio1.551.35
Calmar Ratio4.262.91
Martin Ratio18.648.05
Ulcer Index1.66%8.98%
Daily Std Dev10.82%34.46%
Max Drawdown-51.60%-95.73%
Current Drawdown-0.21%-7.80%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between FRA and SMH is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FRA vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FRA achieves a 22.05% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 48.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FRA has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 7.80%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 29.34% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.27%
16.14%
FRA
SMH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FRA vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRA has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


FRA
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc
Expense ratio chart for FRA: current value at 2.17% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.17%
Expense ratio chart for SMH: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FRA vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FRA, currently valued at 2.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FRA, currently valued at 3.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FRA, currently valued at 1.55, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.55
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FRA, currently valued at 4.26, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.004.26
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FRA, currently valued at 18.64, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0018.64
SMH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SMH, currently valued at 2.10, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.10
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SMH, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.59
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SMH, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SMH, currently valued at 2.91, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.002.91
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SMH, currently valued at 8.05, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.05

FRA vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRA Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRA and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.87
2.10
FRA
SMH

Dividends

FRA vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

FRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.54%, more than SMH's 0.40% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FRA
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc
10.54%10.44%6.89%5.99%7.63%6.48%6.92%5.31%5.65%6.15%6.23%6.37%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.40%0.60%2.37%1.02%1.38%6.00%3.75%2.85%1.61%4.28%2.31%3.11%

Drawdowns

FRA vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRA drawdown since its inception was -51.60%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRA and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.21%
-7.80%
FRA
SMH

Volatility

FRA vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies Fund Inc (FRA) is 3.02%, while VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that FRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.02%
9.32%
FRA
SMH