PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQTIX vs. TPHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQTIX vs. TPHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund (TPHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQTIX achieves a 3.55% return, which is significantly higher than TPHAX's 1.75% return.


FQTIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.74%
YTD
3.55%
6M
4.18%
1Y
9.55%
3Y*
8.69%
5Y*
3.80%
10Y*

TPHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.44%
YTD
1.75%
6M
2.36%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
8.12%
5Y*
3.54%
10Y*
5.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQTIX vs. TPHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
3.55%7.51%8.03%13.44%-14.39%8.51%3.68%4.11%
TPHAX
Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund
1.75%7.57%7.95%12.24%-12.24%5.69%6.12%8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FQTIX and TPHAX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019

0.75

The correlation between FQTIX and TPHAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQTIX vs. TPHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQTIX
FQTIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FQTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FQTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

TPHAX
TPHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TPHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TPHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQTIX vs. TPHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) and Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund (TPHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQTIXTPHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.55

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

2.74

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.37

13.67

+9.70

FQTIX vs. TPHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQTIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.16, which is comparable to the TPHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQTIX and TPHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQTIXTPHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16

2.49

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.82

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.91

-0.31

Drawdowns

FQTIX vs. TPHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQTIX drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum TPHAX drawdown of -35.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTIX and TPHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQTIXTPHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.62%

-35.48%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.20%

-2.50%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.42%

-3.94%

-2.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.81%

-15.98%

-2.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-3.26%

-1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

0.50%

-0.08%

Volatility

FQTIX vs. TPHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) is 0.81%, while Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund (TPHAX) has a volatility of 0.87%. This indicates that FQTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQTIXTPHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.81%

0.87%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

2.24%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

2.76%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.94%

4.34%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.72%

4.86%

+2.86%

FQTIX vs. TPHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQTIX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TPHAX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FQTIX vs. TPHAX - Dividend Comparison

FQTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than TPHAX's 5.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQTIX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I
6.84%5.70%7.86%7.64%8.10%7.15%6.89%5.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPHAX
Timothy Plan High Yield Bond Fund
5.70%5.39%5.75%5.35%4.60%4.23%4.26%4.11%4.13%3.55%3.88%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQTIX and TPHAX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPHAX has higher volatility (0.87%) compared to FQTIX (0.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTIX dropped -24.62% vs TPHAX's -35.48%.

FQTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQTIX and TPHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer