FQTHX vs. SHRAX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FQTHX (Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H) and SHRAX (ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FQTHX is a High Yield Muni fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while SHRAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 5 years, FQTHX returned 2.57%/yr vs 3.13%/yr for SHRAX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FQTHX charges 0.00%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for SHRAX.

Performance

FQTHX vs. SHRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQTHX achieves a 3.21% return, which is significantly higher than SHRAX's 1.90% return.

FQTHX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 3.21%
• 6M: 3.82%
• 1Y: 9.29%
• 3Y*: 7.51%
• 5Y*: 2.57%
• 10Y*: —

SHRAX

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 3.33%
• YTD: 1.90%
• 6M: 0.10%
• 1Y: 8.84%
• 3Y*: 13.45%
• 5Y*: 3.13%
• 10Y*: 8.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQTHX vs. SHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FQTHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H	3.21%	5.94%	8.76%	8.88%	-14.00%	6.04%	4.90%	1.65%
SHRAX ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund	1.90%	13.50%	12.02%	24.09%	-25.43%	7.35%	19.74%	17.10%

Correlation

The correlation between FQTHX and SHRAX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2019	0.10

The correlation between FQTHX and SHRAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FQTHX vs. SHRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQTHX

FQTHX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FQTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FQTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
FQTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FQTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
FQTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 52

SHRAX

SHRAX Risk / Return Rank: 7
SHRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
SHRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
SHRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
SHRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
SHRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQTHX vs. SHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FQTHX	SHRAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.53	0.58	+1.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.15	0.92	+3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.62	1.11	+0.51
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.87	0.69	+2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.99	1.93	+8.06

FQTHX vs. SHRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is higher than the SHRAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQTHX and SHRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FQTHX vs. SHRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQTHX drawdown since its inception was -18.96%, smaller than the maximum SHRAX drawdown of -57.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTHX and SHRAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQTHX	SHRAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.96%	-57.26%	+38.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.30%	-14.59%	+11.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.78%	-23.73%	+15.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.96%	-33.77%	+14.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-3.06%	+2.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.68%	-11.26%	+6.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	5.23%	-4.28%

Volatility

FQTHX vs. SHRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H (FQTHX) is 1.03%, while ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that FQTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQTHX	SHRAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.03%	5.43%	-4.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.76%	13.47%	-10.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.76%	17.54%	-13.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.37%	20.95%	-15.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.06%	20.92%	-14.86%

FQTHX vs. SHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQTHX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRAX's 1.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

FQTHX vs. SHRAX - Dividend Comparison

FQTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.06%, less than SHRAX's 21.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FQTHX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series H	5.06%	6.76%	5.86%	3.67%	3.82%	3.03%	3.05%	1.43%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SHRAX ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund	21.86%	22.27%	20.39%	13.77%	15.63%	26.11%	18.42%	12.71%	18.97%	5.97%	4.76%	4.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQTHX and SHRAX in my portfolio?

FQTHX and SHRAX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FQTHX or SHRAX?

SHRAX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to FQTHX (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQTHX dropped -18.96% vs SHRAX's -57.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FQTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.