FQTEX vs. TSAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E (FQTEX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX).
FQTEX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 2, 2019. TSAIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Dec 8, 2011.
Performance
FQTEX vs. TSAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FQTEX vs. TSAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQTEX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E | -1.00% | 18.87% | 11.38% | 11.57% | -0.98% | 25.45% | 3.35% | 16.31% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | -5.91% | 20.04% | 15.46% | 22.72% | -19.57% | 17.10% | 19.69% | 16.24% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FQTEX achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly higher than TSAIX's -5.91% return.
FQTEX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- 4.56%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- —
TSAIX
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -9.58%
- YTD
- -5.91%
- 6M
- -3.06%
- 1Y
- 15.39%
- 3Y*
- 14.41%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FQTEX vs. TSAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FQTEX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than TSAIX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FQTEX vs. TSAIX — Risk / Return Rank
FQTEX
TSAIX
FQTEX vs. TSAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E (FQTEX) and TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FQTEX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.20 | 0.92 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.79 | 1.37 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | 1.08 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.56 | 4.80 | +1.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FQTEX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.92 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.46 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.65 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FQTEX and TSAIX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FQTEX vs. TSAIX - Dividend Comparison
FQTEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.15%, less than TSAIX's 7.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQTEX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E | 6.15% | 4.74% | 6.17% | 6.56% | 7.78% | 10.36% | 4.31% | 4.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSAIX TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund | 7.84% | 7.38% | 2.94% | 1.81% | 9.27% | 11.82% | 5.59% | 5.71% | 5.71% | 1.13% | 4.12% | 7.19% |
Drawdowns
FQTEX vs. TSAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FQTEX drawdown since its inception was -33.47%, roughly equal to the maximum TSAIX drawdown of -34.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQTEX and TSAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FQTEX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.47% | -34.58% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.48% | -11.72% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.47% | -28.28% | +11.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.77% | -10.28% | +4.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -4.96% | +1.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.77% | -0.43% |
Volatility
FQTEX vs. TSAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E (FQTEX) is 3.40%, while TIAA-CREF Lifestyle Aggressive Growth Fund (TSAIX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that FQTEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FQTEX | TSAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 5.29% | -1.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | 9.81% | -2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.46% | 17.09% | -2.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.95% | 16.15% | -3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.91% | 17.59% | -0.68% |