PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQLSX vs. FOTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQLSX vs. FOTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQLSX achieves a 14.07% return, which is significantly higher than FOTKX's 5.43% return.


FQLSX

1D
0.65%
1M
5.43%
YTD
14.07%
6M
15.67%
1Y
31.25%
3Y*
22.00%
5Y*
11.34%
10Y*

FOTKX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.81%
1Y
12.95%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQLSX vs. FOTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
14.07%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%18.43%25.96%-8.31%10.12%
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
5.43%11.66%5.55%9.97%-13.05%5.68%11.29%14.46%-3.65%5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FQLSX and FOTKX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.88

The correlation between FQLSX and FOTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQLSX vs. FOTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FOTKX
FOTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FOTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FOTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQLSX vs. FOTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQLSXFOTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.55

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

3.26

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.85

14.38

+0.47

FQLSX vs. FOTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQLSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the FOTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQLSX and FOTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQLSXFOTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.67

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.61

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.87

-0.09

Drawdowns

FQLSX vs. FOTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQLSX drawdown since its inception was -31.26%, which is greater than FOTKX's maximum drawdown of -18.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQLSX and FOTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQLSXFOTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.26%

-18.29%

-12.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-4.03%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.37%

-5.71%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.41%

-18.29%

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-3.56%

-1.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

0.91%

+1.23%

Volatility

FQLSX vs. FOTKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a higher volatility of 4.13% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) at 1.94%. This indicates that FQLSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQLSXFOTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

1.94%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

4.14%

+6.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.54%

4.92%

+7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.12%

6.38%

+8.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.08%

6.42%

+9.66%

FQLSX vs. FOTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQLSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FOTKX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FQLSX vs. FOTKX - Dividend Comparison

FQLSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, less than FOTKX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
4.91%5.25%3.32%2.98%7.41%9.53%6.17%6.00%7.24%3.57%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.59%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQLSX and FOTKX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.13%) compared to FOTKX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQLSX dropped -31.26% vs FOTKX's -18.29%.

FOTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQLSX and FOTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer