PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQIFX vs. TLRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FQIFX vs. TLRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Retirement Income Fund (TLRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FQIFX vs. TLRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FQIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class
-2.31%14.84%8.49%13.88%-16.54%9.52%13.56%19.63%-4.51%15.15%
TLRIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Retirement Income Fund
-2.93%11.79%7.65%10.80%-12.53%7.06%11.10%15.31%-3.87%10.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQIFX achieves a -2.31% return, which is significantly higher than TLRIX's -2.93% return. Over the past 10 years, FQIFX has outperformed TLRIX with an annualized return of 7.21%, while TLRIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.57% annualized return.


FQIFX

1D
0.20%
1M
-5.20%
YTD
-2.31%
6M
-0.71%
1Y
10.52%
3Y*
9.49%
5Y*
4.55%
10Y*
7.21%

TLRIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-5.07%
YTD
-2.93%
6M
-1.04%
1Y
7.59%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
5.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FQIFX vs. TLRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQIFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than TLRIX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FQIFX vs. TLRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQIFX
FQIFX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FQIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FQIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

TLRIX
TLRIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
TLRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TLRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQIFX vs. TLRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Retirement Income Fund (TLRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQIFXTLRIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.73

1.67

+0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.39

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.80

6.17

+0.63

FQIFX vs. TLRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.21, which is comparable to the TLRIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQIFX and TLRIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQIFXTLRIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.21

1.20

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.56

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.83

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.64

+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between FQIFX and TLRIX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FQIFX vs. TLRIX - Dividend Comparison

FQIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.04%, more than TLRIX's 4.72% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class
5.04%4.92%3.36%2.37%2.64%2.10%2.38%13.76%2.31%1.83%1.88%1.93%
TLRIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Retirement Income Fund
4.72%5.23%3.53%3.32%6.10%7.66%5.77%3.85%6.04%2.13%3.75%2.98%

Drawdowns

FQIFX vs. TLRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQIFX drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, smaller than the maximum TLRIX drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQIFX and TLRIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FQIFXTLRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-26.71%

+4.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.77%

-5.23%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

-17.15%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.66%

-17.15%

-5.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.79%

-5.23%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.92%

-3.34%

-0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.18%

+0.36%

Volatility

FQIFX vs. TLRIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Retirement Income Fund (TLRIX) at 2.54%. This indicates that FQIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FQIFXTLRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

2.54%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.36%

4.08%

+1.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.18%

6.57%

+2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.49%

6.65%

+2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.86%

6.78%

+3.08%