PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQIFX vs. LTTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FQIFX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQIFX achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly higher than LTTIX's 2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, FQIFX has outperformed LTTIX with an annualized return of 8.18%, while LTTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.


FQIFX

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.17%
YTD
6.69%
6M
6.40%
1Y
16.20%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
8.18%

LTTIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.08%
YTD
2.74%
6M
2.59%
1Y
8.04%
3Y*
8.33%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQIFX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FQIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class
6.69%14.84%8.49%13.88%-16.54%9.52%13.56%19.63%-4.51%15.15%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
2.74%9.29%6.73%10.36%-12.36%8.61%10.61%17.82%-3.97%13.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FQIFX and LTTIX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.96

The correlation between FQIFX and LTTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FQIFX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQIFX
FQIFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FQIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FQIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

LTTIX
LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQIFX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FQIFXLTTIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.82

2.47

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

10.68

+1.50

FQIFX vs. LTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQIFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the LTTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQIFX and LTTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FQIFX vs. LTTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQIFX drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, which is greater than LTTIX's maximum drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQIFX and LTTIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FQIFXLTTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.66%

-19.33%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.98%

-3.64%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.59%

-5.77%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.66%

-16.92%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.66%

-19.33%

-3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.45%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.86%

-2.68%

-1.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.38%

0.84%

+0.54%

Volatility

FQIFX vs. LTTIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class (FQIFX) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) at 1.34%. This indicates that FQIFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FQIFXLTTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

1.34%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

3.32%

+3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.80%

4.18%

+3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.62%

6.37%

+3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.92%

7.24%

+2.68%

FQIFX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQIFX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FQIFX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

FQIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than LTTIX's 11.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQIFX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2025 Fund Investor Class
4.33%4.92%3.36%2.37%2.64%2.10%2.38%13.76%2.31%1.83%1.88%1.93%
LTTIX
MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund
11.54%8.13%7.07%3.30%5.88%7.35%2.83%3.68%4.32%3.51%4.03%1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


FQIFX and LTTIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQIFX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to LTTIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQIFX dropped -22.66% vs LTTIX's -19.33%.

FQIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FQIFX and LTTIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer