FQAL vs. FELC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FQAL (Fidelity Quality Factor ETF) and FELC (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. FQAL is passively managed, while FELC is actively managed. Over the past year, FQAL returned 21.12% vs 28.58% for FELC. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FQAL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FELC.

Performance

FQAL vs. FELC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQAL achieves a 7.87% return, which is significantly lower than FELC's 11.23% return.

FQAL

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 4.38%
• YTD: 7.87%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: 21.12%
• 3Y*: 20.04%
• 5Y*: 12.41%
• 10Y*: —

FELC

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 5.59%
• YTD: 11.23%
• 6M: 11.57%
• 1Y: 28.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FQAL vs. FELC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	7.87%	16.93%	21.92%	4.88%
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF	11.23%	17.09%	25.25%	5.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FQAL and FELC is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2023	0.95

The correlation between FQAL and FELC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

FQAL vs. FELC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FQAL	FELC
Technology	34.3%	38.2%
Financial Services	12.3%	12.2%
Communication Services	10.5%	12.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	9.8%
Industrials	9.1%	9.6%
Healthcare	8.9%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	2.8%
Energy	3.9%	3.7%
Basic Materials	2.2%	1.5%
Utilities	2.2%	1.3%
Real Estate	2.2%	1.0%

Return for Risk

FQAL vs. FELC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQAL

FQAL Risk / Return Rank: 55
FQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 54
FQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FELC

FELC Risk / Return Rank: 70
FELC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FELC Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FELC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FELC Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FELC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQAL vs. FELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FQAL	FELC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	2.41	-0.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	3.29	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.44	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	3.16	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.41	14.66	-3.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FQAL vs. FELC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is comparable to the FELC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQAL and FELC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FQAL	FELC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	2.41	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.77	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	1.59	-0.77

Drawdowns

FQAL vs. FELC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, which is greater than FELC's maximum drawdown of -18.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and FELC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FQAL	FELC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.71%	-18.59%	-15.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.43%	-9.09%	+0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.87%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-0.59%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-1.91%	-2.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	1.95%	-0.09%

Volatility

FQAL vs. FELC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is 2.33%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF (FELC) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that FQAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FQAL	FELC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.33%	2.78%	-0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.57%	8.93%	-0.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.21%	11.90%	-0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.18%	15.17%	+1.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	15.17%	+2.41%

FQAL vs. FELC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FQAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FELC's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FQAL vs. FELC - Dividend Comparison

FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than FELC's 0.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FELC Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF	0.85%	0.92%	1.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF	1.12%	1.12%	1.20%	1.35%	1.52%	1.17%	1.46%	1.55%	1.73%	1.53%	0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FQAL and FELC in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FQAL and FELC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FQAL or FELC?

FELC has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to FQAL (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQAL dropped -33.71% vs FELC's -18.59%.

Which ETF is better, FQAL or FELC?

On 1-year performance, FELC leads with 28.58% vs 21.12% for FQAL. On fees, FELC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FQAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FQAL or FELC?

Over the 1-year period, FELC has performed better with a 28.58% return vs 21.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FQAL or FELC?

FELC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FQAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FQAL or FELC?

FQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.85% for FELC.

What is the main difference between FQAL and FELC?

Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FQAL and 0.18% for FELC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FELC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.