PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FQAL vs. FDVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FQAL vs. FDVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FQAL vs. FDVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
-3.61%16.93%21.92%24.20%-19.70%32.13%16.17%28.12%-4.39%23.03%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
-1.78%17.08%21.81%18.00%-4.21%29.24%2.80%24.07%-1.26%14.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FQAL achieves a -3.61% return, which is significantly lower than FDVV's -1.78% return.


FQAL

1D
2.61%
1M
-5.34%
YTD
-3.61%
6M
-2.20%
1Y
14.58%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
11.10%
10Y*

FDVV

1D
2.35%
1M
-5.66%
YTD
-1.78%
6M
0.65%
1Y
14.82%
3Y*
16.89%
5Y*
12.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FQAL vs. FDVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FQAL and FDVV have an expense ratio of 0.29%.


Return for Risk

FQAL vs. FDVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FQAL
FQAL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
FQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

FDVV
FDVV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FDVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDVV Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FDVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDVV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FQAL vs. FDVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FQALFDVVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

0.97

-0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.36

1.41

-0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.29

+0.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.53

5.68

+0.84

FQAL vs. FDVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FQAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the FDVV Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FQAL and FDVV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FQALFDVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.97

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.86

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.74

+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between FQAL and FDVV is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FQAL vs. FDVV - Dividend Comparison

FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than FDVV's 3.00% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FQAL
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
1.25%1.12%1.20%1.35%1.52%1.17%1.46%1.55%1.73%1.53%0.43%
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
3.00%2.89%2.94%3.77%3.44%2.70%3.19%3.93%4.05%3.66%1.04%

Drawdowns

FQAL vs. FDVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum FDVV drawdown of -40.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and FDVV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FQALFDVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-40.25%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-12.34%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.50%

-20.18%

-5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.04%

-7.04%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.66%

-3.85%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.81%

-0.42%

Volatility

FQAL vs. FDVV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to Fidelity High Dividend ETF (FDVV) at 4.48%. This indicates that FQAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FQALFDVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.99%

4.48%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

7.68%

+1.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

15.34%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

14.74%

+1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.68%

17.09%

+0.59%