FQAL vs. DGRE
FQAL (Fidelity Quality Factor ETF) and DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. FQAL is passively managed, while DGRE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FQAL returned 11.43%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for DGRE. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FQAL charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for DGRE.
Performance
FQAL vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FQAL achieves a 9.52% return, which is significantly lower than DGRE's 22.89% return.
FQAL
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 7.92%
- YTD
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.45%
DGRE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- YTD
- 22.89%
- 1Y
- 42.31%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $225.72K | $519.73K | $485.46K | |
| $3.79M | $3.24M | $3.26M |
FQAL vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 9.52% | 16.93% | 21.92% | 24.20% | -19.70% | 32.13% | 16.17% | 28.12% | -4.39% | 23.03% |
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 22.89% | 27.47% | 3.63% | 18.46% | -21.86% | 2.55% | 10.85% | 21.12% | -16.36% | 33.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FQAL and DGRE is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between FQAL and DGRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (5 years) to 0.70 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FQAL vs. DGRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FQAL
DGRE
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
FQAL
DGRE
Financial Services
FQAL
DGRE
Consumer Cyclical
FQAL
DGRE
Industrials
FQAL
DGRE
Communication Services
FQAL
DGRE
Healthcare
FQAL
DGRE
Consumer Defensive
FQAL
DGRE
Energy
FQAL
DGRE
Basic Materials
FQAL
DGRE
Real Estate
FQAL
DGRE
Utilities
FQAL
DGRE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FQAL vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank
FQAL
DGRE
FQAL vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FQAL | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.32 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 3.07 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.21 | 9.68 | -0.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FQAL vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FQAL drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum DGRE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FQAL and DGRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FQAL | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.71% | -36.95% | +3.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.43% | -13.68% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.87% | -20.65% | +3.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.50% | -33.43% | +7.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -9.16% | +8.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -11.93% | +7.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 4.33% | -2.43% |
Volatility
FQAL vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Quality Factor ETF (FQAL) is 2.43%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that FQAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FQAL | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.43% | 8.92% | -6.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 22.64% | -13.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 24.24% | -12.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.20% | 19.08% | -2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 19.98% | -2.49% |
FQAL vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FQAL has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than DGRE's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
FQAL vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison
FQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than DGRE's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
FQAL Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | 1.15% | 1.12% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.17% | 1.46% | 1.55% | 1.73% | 1.53% | 0.43% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FQAL and DGRE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRE has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to FQAL (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FQAL dropped -33.71% vs DGRE's -36.95%.
On 5-year performance, FQAL leads with 11.43% vs 8.52% for DGRE. On fees, FQAL is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FQAL has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FQAL has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FQAL is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for DGRE.
DGRE has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.15% for FQAL.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for FQAL and 0.32% for DGRE.
DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FQAL and DGRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer