PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPXI vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPXI vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FPXI having a 38.06% return and KEMX slightly higher at 38.57%.


FPXI

1D
-5.63%
1M
8.84%
YTD
38.06%
6M
35.72%
1Y
51.16%
3Y*
29.56%
5Y*
4.36%
10Y*
13.94%

KEMX

1D
-5.69%
1M
5.55%
YTD
38.57%
6M
40.16%
1Y
71.39%
3Y*
28.36%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPXI vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
38.06%26.37%12.62%9.56%-31.83%-15.73%71.50%15.52%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
38.57%38.28%0.36%20.57%-19.35%10.55%12.84%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between FPXI and KEMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.71

The correlation between FPXI and KEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FPXI vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FPXI
KEMX

Technology

37.3%
46.8%

Industrials

21.5%
7.6%

Basic Materials

13.2%
7.6%

Healthcare

10.9%
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
5.5%

Financial Services

4.2%
18.7%

Communication Services

2.2%
2.9%

Energy

2.1%
4.0%

Utilities

1.0%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

0.7%
2.6%

Real Estate

0.5%
1.0%

Technology

FPXI
37.3%
KEMX
46.8%

Industrials

FPXI
21.5%
KEMX
7.6%

Basic Materials

FPXI
13.2%
KEMX
7.6%

Healthcare

FPXI
10.9%
KEMX
1.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FPXI
6.5%
KEMX
5.5%

Financial Services

FPXI
4.2%
KEMX
18.7%

Communication Services

FPXI
2.2%
KEMX
2.9%

Energy

FPXI
2.1%
KEMX
4.0%

Utilities

FPXI
1.0%
KEMX
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

FPXI
0.7%
KEMX
2.6%

Real Estate

FPXI
0.5%
KEMX
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPXI vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPXI
FPXI Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FPXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FPXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPXI vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPXIKEMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.51

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

4.67

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

17.76

-6.11

FPXI vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPXI Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the KEMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPXI and KEMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPXI vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPXI drawdown since its inception was -55.78%, which is greater than KEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPXI and KEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPXIKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.78%

-38.80%

-16.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.77%

-15.36%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.58%

-19.62%

-0.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.75%

-30.85%

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-5.69%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.17%

-8.82%

-11.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

4.03%

+0.37%

Volatility

FPXI vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) have volatilities of 13.69% and 13.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPXIKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.69%

13.52%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.40%

23.20%

+0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.63%

25.26%

+1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

18.96%

+3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.46%

21.33%

+0.13%

FPXI vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPXI has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPXI vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

FPXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than KEMX's 2.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
0.58%0.70%0.93%0.71%1.13%0.71%0.18%0.67%1.75%0.75%2.09%1.34%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.37%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPXI and KEMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPXI has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to KEMX (13.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPXI dropped -55.78% vs KEMX's -38.80%.

On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.33% vs 4.36% for FPXI. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, KEMX has been the lower-risk option at 13.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 0.58% for FPXI.

FPXI tracks IPOX International Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FPXI and 0.25% for KEMX.

KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPXI and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer