FPX vs. QARP
FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) and QARP (Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FPX tracks the IPOX-100 U.S. Index while QARP tracks the Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPX returned 9.26%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for QARP. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for QARP.
Performance
FPX vs. QARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FPX having a 12.24% return and QARP slightly higher at 12.78%.
FPX
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -6.81%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 1Y
- 26.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 13.88%
QARP
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 9.34%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 25.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 12.09%
- 10Y*
- —
FPX vs. QARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 12.24% | 37.62% | 24.75% | 22.26% | -35.11% | 3.69% | 47.89% | 30.37% | -8.66% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 12.78% | 13.99% | 18.94% | 23.03% | -14.62% | 31.82% | 14.83% | 30.70% | -5.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPX and QARP is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2018 | 0.73 |
The correlation between FPX and QARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FPX vs. QARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FPX
QARP
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Healthcare
FPX
QARP
Technology
FPX
QARP
Industrials
FPX
QARP
Financial Services
FPX
QARP
Communication Services
FPX
QARP
Consumer Cyclical
FPX
QARP
Energy
FPX
QARP
Consumer Defensive
FPX
QARP
Real Estate
FPX
QARP
Basic Materials
FPX
QARP
Utilities
FPX
QARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPX vs. QARP — Risk / Return Rank
FPX
QARP
FPX vs. QARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPX | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 3.46 | -1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.39 | 15.38 | -8.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPX vs. QARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than QARP's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and QARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPX | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.29% | -35.44% | -20.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | -7.26% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -15.65% | -15.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.14% | -22.75% | -20.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.99% | 0.00% | -10.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.29% | -4.39% | -6.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 1.63% | +2.49% |
Volatility
FPX vs. QARP - Volatility Comparison
First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF (QARP) at 2.76%. This indicates that FPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPX | QARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 2.76% | +7.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.77% | 8.22% | +11.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.51% | 10.58% | +14.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.99% | 15.54% | +11.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.49% | 19.55% | +4.94% |
FPX vs. QARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than QARP's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPX vs. QARP - Dividend Comparison
FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than QARP's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.46% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
QARP Xtrackers Russell 1000 US Quality at a Reasonable Price ETF | 1.02% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.28% | 1.68% | 1.34% | 1.61% | 1.85% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPX and QARP have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPX has higher volatility (10.01%) compared to QARP (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPX dropped -56.29% vs QARP's -35.44%.
On 5-year performance, QARP leads with 12.09% vs 9.26% for FPX. On fees, QARP is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, QARP has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QARP has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QARP is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FPX.
QARP has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.46% for FPX.
FPX tracks IPOX-100 U.S. Index, while QARP tracks Russell 1000 2Qual/Val 5% Capped Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.19% for QARP.
QARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPX and QARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer