FPX vs. HYP
FPX (First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF) and HYP (Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. FPX is passively managed, while HYP is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FPX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HYP.
Performance
FPX vs. HYP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPX achieves a 22.57% return, which is significantly lower than HYP's 33.57% return.
FPX
- 1D
- 2.06%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 22.57%
- 6M
- 19.18%
- 1Y
- 45.11%
- 3Y*
- 31.84%
- 5Y*
- 10.64%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
HYP
- 1D
- 3.85%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 33.57%
- 6M
- 30.99%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPX vs. HYP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 22.57% | -1.12% |
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 33.57% | -6.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPX and HYP is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPX vs. HYP — Risk / Return Rank
FPX
HYP
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FPX vs. HYP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF (FPX) and Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF (HYP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPX | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPX vs. HYP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPX drawdown since its inception was -56.29%, which is greater than HYP's maximum drawdown of -19.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPX and HYP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPX | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.29% | -19.58% | -36.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.61% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.32% | -6.47% | -4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.85% | — | — |
Volatility
FPX vs. HYP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPX | HYP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 43.01% | -18.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.69% | 43.01% | -16.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.39% | 43.01% | -18.62% |
FPX vs. HYP - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than HYP's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPX vs. HYP - Dividend Comparison
FPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, more than HYP's 0.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPX First Trust US Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.47% | 0.53% | 0.09% | 0.27% | 1.08% | 0.14% | 0.28% | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.68% | 0.77% | 0.62% |
HYP Golden Eagle Dynamic Hypergrowth ETF | 0.10% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPX and HYP have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FPX is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FPX is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HYP.
FPX has the higher dividend yield at 0.47%, compared with 0.10% for HYP.
They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Golden Eagle. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FPX and 0.85% for HYP.
Find the right allocation for FPX and HYP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer