PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPURX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPURX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Puritan Fund (FPURX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPURX achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 18.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FPURX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 11.53%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.88% annualized return.


FPURX

1D
0.35%
1M
4.19%
YTD
10.15%
6M
10.56%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
9.61%
10Y*
11.53%

FBGRX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.10%
YTD
18.56%
6M
19.76%
1Y
44.98%
3Y*
32.54%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
21.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPURX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPURX
Fidelity Puritan Fund
10.15%12.22%18.94%20.20%-17.35%18.92%20.58%21.27%-4.18%18.28%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
18.56%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FPURX and FBGRX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1988

0.90

The correlation between FPURX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPURX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPURX
FPURX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FPURX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPURX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPURX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FPURX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPURX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPURX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Puritan Fund (FPURX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPURXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.46

2.67

-0.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.39

3.41

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.45

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

3.67

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.75

15.56

-0.80

FPURX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPURX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPURX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPURXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.46

2.67

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.69

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

0.93

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.68

+0.05

Drawdowns

FPURX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPURX drawdown since its inception was -31.76%, smaller than the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPURX and FBGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPURXFBGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.76%

-58.64%

+26.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-12.65%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-27.07%

+10.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.53%

-43.08%

+20.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.93%

-43.08%

+19.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.65%

-12.53%

+7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

2.98%

-1.36%

Volatility

FPURX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Puritan Fund (FPURX) is 3.21%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that FPURX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPURXFBGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.21%

4.14%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.81%

13.00%

-5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.75%

17.44%

-7.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

24.88%

-11.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.10%

23.69%

-10.59%

FPURX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPURX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPURX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FPURX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, more than FBGRX's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.60%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%
FPURX
Fidelity Puritan Fund
6.19%6.83%11.30%5.34%9.38%13.10%5.10%4.29%15.26%3.78%3.71%7.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FPURX and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBGRX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to FPURX (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPURX dropped -31.76% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPURX and FBGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer