FPRO vs. VNQI

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FPRO (Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF) and VNQI (Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. FPRO is actively managed, while VNQI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPRO returned 3.70%/yr vs -1.53%/yr for VNQI. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FPRO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VNQI.

Performance

FPRO vs. VNQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPRO achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly higher than VNQI's -2.64% return.

FPRO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 13.74%
• 1Y: 11.83%
• 3Y*: 11.55%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: —

VNQI

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -2.15%
• YTD: -2.64%
• 6M: -3.08%
• 1Y: 2.39%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: -1.53%
• 10Y*: 2.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPRO vs. VNQI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF	14.10%	2.60%	5.63%	10.93%	-25.02%	40.20%
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF	-2.64%	21.38%	-2.22%	6.99%	-22.94%	7.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FPRO and VNQI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.61
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021	0.61

The correlation between FPRO and VNQI shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.62 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FPRO vs. VNQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPRO

FPRO Risk / Return Rank: 28
FPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
FPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 24
FPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 33

VNQI

VNQI Risk / Return Rank: 11
VNQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
VNQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
VNQI Omega Ratio Rank: 10
VNQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
VNQI Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPRO vs. VNQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) and Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FPRO	VNQI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.17	+0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.26	0.34	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.04	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	0.16	+1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.51	0.43	+4.08

FPRO vs. VNQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the VNQI Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPRO and VNQI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FPRO vs. VNQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPRO drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, smaller than the maximum VNQI drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPRO and VNQI.

Drawdown Indicators

	FPRO	VNQI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.81%	-38.35%	+5.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.67%	-14.78%	+7.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.83%	-16.35%	-0.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.81%	-34.92%	+2.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-12.08%	+11.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.52%	-10.89%	-1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	5.53%	-2.85%

Volatility

FPRO vs. VNQI - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF (VNQI) at 4.50%. This indicates that FPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VNQI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FPRO	VNQI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.00%	4.50%	+0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.98%	11.94%	-1.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.68%	13.78%	-0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	15.55%	+3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.37%	15.95%	+2.42%

FPRO vs. VNQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPRO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VNQI's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

FPRO vs. VNQI - Dividend Comparison

FPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.49%, less than VNQI's 4.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF	2.49%	2.69%	2.50%	2.83%	2.67%	1.69%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VNQI Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Real Estate ETF	4.83%	4.70%	5.16%	3.74%	0.57%	6.48%	0.93%	7.58%	4.62%	3.86%	5.18%	2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FPRO and VNQI in my portfolio?

FPRO and VNQI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FPRO or VNQI?

FPRO has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to VNQI (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPRO dropped -32.81% vs VNQI's -38.35%.

Which ETF is better, FPRO or VNQI?

On 5-year performance, FPRO leads with 3.70% vs -1.53% for VNQI. On fees, VNQI is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VNQI has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FPRO or VNQI?

Over the 5-year period, FPRO has performed better with a 3.70% return vs -1.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FPRO or VNQI?

VNQI is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FPRO or VNQI?

VNQI has the higher dividend yield at 4.83%, compared with 2.49% for FPRO.

What is the main difference between FPRO and VNQI?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPRO and 0.12% for VNQI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.