FPRO vs. SRVR
FPRO (Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. FPRO is actively managed, while SRVR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FPRO returned 3.53%/yr vs -3.67%/yr for SRVR. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FPRO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for SRVR.
Performance
FPRO vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPRO achieves a 17.00% return, which is significantly higher than SRVR's 6.87% return.
FPRO
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 13.03%
- YTD
- 17.00%
- 1Y
- 16.56%
- 3Y*
- 9.84%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- —
SRVR
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- -10.64%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 6.87%
- 1Y
- -4.54%
- 3Y*
- 3.89%
- 5Y*
- -3.67%
- 10Y*
- —
FPRO vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF | 17.00% | 2.60% | 5.63% | 10.93% | -25.02% | 40.20% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 6.87% | -1.99% | 2.70% | 6.84% | -31.90% | 17.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPRO and SRVR is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FPRO and SRVR has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPRO vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank
FPRO
SRVR
FPRO vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) and Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPRO | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.97 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | -0.30 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.27 | -0.60 | +6.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPRO vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPRO drawdown since its inception was -32.81%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPRO and SRVR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPRO | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.81% | -40.99% | +8.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.67% | -14.98% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.83% | -18.34% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.81% | -40.99% | +8.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -21.75% | +21.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.40% | -15.27% | +2.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 7.55% | -4.90% |
Volatility
FPRO vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF (SRVR) at 4.22%. This indicates that FPRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPRO | SRVR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.13% | 4.22% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.56% | 14.02% | -3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.89% | 17.29% | -3.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 19.85% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.35% | 21.41% | -3.06% |
FPRO vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FPRO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FPRO vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison
FPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, less than SRVR's 2.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPRO Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF | 2.42% | 2.69% | 2.50% | 2.83% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SRVR Pacer Data & Infrastructure Real Estate ETF | 2.86% | 2.67% | 2.00% | 3.69% | 1.70% | 1.19% | 1.59% | 1.61% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FPRO and SRVR have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPRO has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to SRVR (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPRO dropped -32.81% vs SRVR's -40.99%.
On 5-year performance, FPRO leads with 3.53% vs -3.67% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 4.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FPRO has performed better with a 3.53% return vs -3.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SRVR is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPRO.
SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.42% for FPRO.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FPRO and 0.49% for SRVR.
FPRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPRO and SRVR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer