PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPNIX vs. SDMZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPNIX vs. SDMZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPNIX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than SDMZX's 1.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FPNIX has underperformed SDMZX with an annualized return of 2.83%, while SDMZX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.15% annualized return.


FPNIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.02%
6M
0.14%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
2.94%
10Y*
2.83%

SDMZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.56%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
3.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPNIX vs. SDMZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPNIX
FPA New Income Fund
-0.02%6.71%4.58%6.78%-3.10%0.84%2.51%3.81%2.30%2.67%
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.15%6.18%5.64%6.25%-4.82%-0.19%3.97%7.92%0.95%3.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FPNIX and SDMZX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.51

Over the past year, FPNIX and SDMZX have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.51, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPNIX vs. SDMZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPNIX
FPNIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FPNIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPNIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPNIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FPNIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPNIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

SDMZX
SDMZX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SDMZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDMZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDMZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SDMZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDMZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPNIX vs. SDMZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FPNIXSDMZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.54

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.58

-1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

14.98

-8.75

FPNIX vs. SDMZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPNIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SDMZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPNIX and SDMZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FPNIXSDMZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.66

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.21

1.11

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.49

1.23

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.02

1.20

-0.19

Drawdowns

FPNIX vs. SDMZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPNIX drawdown since its inception was -22.95%, which is greater than SDMZX's maximum drawdown of -9.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPNIX and SDMZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPNIXSDMZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.95%

-9.76%

-13.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.97%

-1.44%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.97%

-1.44%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.67%

-8.51%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-4.67%

-9.76%

+5.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-1.44%

+0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-0.99%

-0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

0.34%

+0.33%

Volatility

FPNIX vs. SDMZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FPA New Income Fund (FPNIX) is 0.75%, while PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) has a volatility of 2.46%. This indicates that FPNIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SDMZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPNIXSDMZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.75%

2.46%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.67%

2.79%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34%

3.12%

-0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.44%

2.55%

-0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.90%

2.58%

-0.68%

FPNIX vs. SDMZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FPNIX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SDMZX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FPNIX vs. SDMZX - Dividend Comparison

FPNIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than SDMZX's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPNIX
FPA New Income Fund
3.82%3.36%4.39%3.37%2.13%1.24%2.17%2.63%3.10%2.84%2.31%1.87%
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
4.69%4.62%4.57%3.36%4.70%2.76%3.10%6.18%3.47%2.64%2.76%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPNIX and SDMZX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDMZX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to FPNIX (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPNIX dropped -22.95% vs SDMZX's -9.76%.

FPNIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPNIX and SDMZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer