PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FPH vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FPH vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPH achieves a -10.73% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 9.74% return.


FPH

1D
-2.54%
1M
1.84%
YTD
-10.73%
6M
-8.78%
1Y
-9.27%
3Y*
23.18%
5Y*
-9.19%
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.09%
YTD
9.74%
6M
9.27%
1Y
26.65%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
15.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FPH vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FPH
Five Point Holdings, LLC
-10.73%47.88%23.13%31.76%-64.37%19.78%-21.44%0.14%-50.78%-7.24%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
9.74%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%13.13%

Correlation

The correlation between FPH and SPY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FPH vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPH
FPH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FPH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPH Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
FPH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPH Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FPH vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FPHSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.39

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.34

3.01

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.59

13.54

-14.12

FPH vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FPH Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPH and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FPH vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPH drawdown since its inception was -87.96%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPH and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FPHSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.96%

-55.19%

-32.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.43%

-8.88%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.27%

-18.76%

-20.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.32%

-24.50%

-52.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-69.67%

-1.75%

-67.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-9.04%

-51.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.79%

1.97%

+13.82%

Volatility

FPH vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) has a higher volatility of 6.76% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that FPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FPHSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.76%

4.64%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.64%

9.75%

+9.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.34%

12.43%

+19.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.80%

17.14%

+29.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.43%

17.99%

+29.44%

Dividends

FPH vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

FPH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPH
Five Point Holdings, LLC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FPH and SPY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPH has higher volatility (6.76%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPH dropped -87.96% vs SPY's -55.19%.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FPH and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer