PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FPH vs. JLL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FPH and JLL is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

FPH vs. JLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%100.00%120.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
95.99%
16.16%
FPH
JLL

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FPH:

1.52

JLL:

2.05

Sortino Ratio

FPH:

3.43

JLL:

2.98

Omega Ratio

FPH:

1.41

JLL:

1.34

Calmar Ratio

FPH:

1.03

JLL:

1.76

Martin Ratio

FPH:

10.89

JLL:

12.52

Ulcer Index

FPH:

7.80%

JLL:

5.17%

Daily Std Dev

FPH:

55.82%

JLL:

31.50%

Max Drawdown

FPH:

-87.96%

JLL:

-85.93%

Current Drawdown

FPH:

-64.26%

JLL:

-0.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FPH:

$954.19M

JLL:

$13.41B

EPS

FPH:

$0.96

JLL:

$10.01

PE Ratio

FPH:

6.69

JLL:

28.24

PEG Ratio

FPH:

0.00

JLL:

0.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

FPH:

$78.14M

JLL:

$16.62B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FPH:

$64.91M

JLL:

$16.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

FPH:

$44.11M

JLL:

$688.10M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FPH achieves a 55.56% return, which is significantly higher than JLL's 11.67% return.


FPH

YTD

55.56%

1M

44.12%

6M

96.00%

1Y

84.91%

5Y*

-8.19%

10Y*

N/A

JLL

YTD

11.67%

1M

8.03%

6M

13.75%

1Y

49.62%

5Y*

11.29%

10Y*

5.92%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FPH vs. JLL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FPH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FPH is 8888
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FPH is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FPH is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FPH is 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FPH is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FPH is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

JLL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JLL is 9090
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JLL is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JLL is 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JLL is 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JLL is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JLL is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FPH vs. JLL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FPH, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.522.05
The chart of Sortino ratio for FPH, currently valued at 3.43, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.432.98
The chart of Omega ratio for FPH, currently valued at 1.41, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.411.34
The chart of Calmar ratio for FPH, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.031.76
The chart of Martin ratio for FPH, currently valued at 10.89, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0010.8912.52
FPH
JLL

The current FPH Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the JLL Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FPH and JLL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.52
2.05
FPH
JLL

Dividends

FPH vs. JLL - Dividend Comparison

Neither FPH nor JLL has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FPH
Five Point Holdings, LLC
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JLL
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.59%0.65%0.48%0.63%0.35%0.47%

Drawdowns

FPH vs. JLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FPH drawdown since its inception was -87.96%, roughly equal to the maximum JLL drawdown of -85.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPH and JLL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-64.26%
-0.73%
FPH
JLL

Volatility

FPH vs. JLL - Volatility Comparison

Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) has a higher volatility of 37.50% compared to Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) at 7.02%. This indicates that FPH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
37.50%
7.02%
FPH
JLL

Financials

FPH vs. JLL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Five Point Holdings, LLC and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab