FPH vs. JLL
FPH (Five Point Holdings, LLC) and JLL (Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — FPH in Real Estate - Development, JLL in Real Estate - Services. Over the past 5 years, FPH returned -9.19%/yr vs 7.74%/yr for JLL. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FPH vs. JLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FPH achieves a -10.73% return, which is significantly higher than JLL's -12.37% return.
FPH
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- -10.73%
- 6M
- -8.78%
- 1Y
- -9.27%
- 3Y*
- 23.18%
- 5Y*
- -9.19%
- 10Y*
- —
JLL
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- -12.37%
- 6M
- -13.40%
- 1Y
- 23.64%
- 3Y*
- 26.39%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.28%
FPH vs. JLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC | -10.73% | 47.88% | 23.13% | 31.76% | -64.37% | 19.78% | -21.44% | 0.14% | -50.78% | -7.24% |
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | -12.37% | 32.92% | 34.03% | 18.51% | -40.83% | 81.53% | -14.77% | 38.32% | -14.54% | 23.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FPH and JLL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2017 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
FPH:
$3.57B
JLL:
$14.09B
FPH:
$0.14
JLL:
$18.60
FPH:
35.55
JLL:
15.85
FPH:
0.10
JLL:
0.67
FPH:
13.14
JLL:
0.53
FPH:
1.64
JLL:
1.93
FPH:
$110.44M
JLL:
$26.76B
FPH:
$44.62M
JLL:
$14.76B
FPH:
$2.04M
JLL:
$1.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FPH vs. JLL — Risk / Return Rank
FPH
JLL
FPH vs. JLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FPH | JLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.16 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | 1.09 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 2.52 | -3.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FPH vs. JLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FPH drawdown since its inception was -87.96%, roughly equal to the maximum JLL drawdown of -85.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FPH and JLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FPH | JLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.96% | -85.92% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.43% | -21.89% | -5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.27% | -30.59% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.32% | -55.54% | -21.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -69.67% | -17.79% | -51.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.61% | -30.90% | -29.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.79% | 9.42% | +6.37% |
Volatility
FPH vs. JLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Five Point Holdings, LLC (FPH) is 6.76%, while Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) has a volatility of 8.13%. This indicates that FPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FPH | JLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.76% | 8.13% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.64% | 28.08% | -8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.34% | 33.66% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.80% | 35.07% | +11.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.43% | 36.35% | +11.08% |
Dividends
FPH vs. JLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither FPH nor JLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPH Five Point Holdings, LLC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JLL Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.49% | 0.65% | 0.48% | 0.63% | 0.35% |
Financials
FPH vs. JLL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Five Point Holdings, LLC and Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FPH vs. JLL - Profitability Comparison
FPH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five Point Holdings, LLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 13.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
JLL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a gross profit of 3.45B and revenue of 6.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.0%.
FPH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five Point Holdings, LLC reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 13.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
JLL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported an operating income of 204.60M and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.2%.
FPH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Five Point Holdings, LLC reported a net income of -6.85M and revenue of 13.58M, resulting in a net margin of -50.5%.
JLL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated reported a net income of 159.00M and revenue of 6.39B, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FPH and JLL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JLL has higher volatility (8.13%) compared to FPH (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FPH dropped -87.96% vs JLL's -85.92%.
JLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.71 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FPH and JLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer